Erratum to Leboeuf-Yde and Hestbæk's commentary: Chiropractic and children: Is more research enough?
Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde, University of Southern Denmark
2 July 2010
The authors have found a typing error in the very last sentence under the subheading "Which diagnostic tests can we trust?". The faulty sentence is: "If the test is neither biologically implausible nor validated, it corresponds to a red light situation and should not be used."
However, this sentence should read:"If the test is neither biologically plausible nor validated, it corresponds to a red light situation and should not be used."
Our apologies to the readers!
Competing interests
The authors declare to have no competing interests.
Erratum to Leboeuf-Yde and Hestbæk's commentary: Chiropractic and children: Is more research enough?
2 July 2010
The authors have found a typing error in the very last sentence under the subheading "Which diagnostic tests can we trust?". The faulty sentence is: "If the test is neither biologically implausible nor validated, it corresponds to a red light situation and should not be used."
However, this sentence should read:"If the test is neither biologically plausible nor validated, it corresponds to a red light situation and should not be used."
Our apologies to the readers!
Competing interests
The authors declare to have no competing interests.