Skip to main content

Table 5 Data collection schedule

From: Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Outcomes

Variables

BL1

BL2

2W

6W

12W

24W

39W

52W

Background

Demographics; comorbidities

Q

       
 

Duration of episode; history of SMT and massage care

 

Q

      

Primary Objective

Dose-Response

Headache

CGH frequency in 4 weeks prior

Q

D, Q

 

D, Q

D, Q

D, Q

D, Q

D, Q

 

CGH pain

Q

D, Q

 

D, Q

D, Q

D, Q

D, Q

D, Q

 

CGH disability

 

Q

 

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

 

CGH improvement: pain, global perceived effect

   

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

 

Other headache days

 

D, Q

 

D, Q

D, Q

D, Q

D, Q

D, Q

Neck Pain

Frequency (days) of neck pain

Q

Q

 

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Quality of Life

EuroQol-5D

 

Q

  

Q

Q

Q

Q

Satisfaction

Likert Scale, success of care

   

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Medication

Frequency of prescription and non-prescription medication (days)

 

D, Q

 

D, Q

D, Q

D, Q

D, Q

D, Q

Outside Care

CGH care from external providers

 

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Objective Measures

Kinematics and cervical segmental joint function

X

  

X

    

Secondary Objective

Cost Effectiveness

 Healthcare Utilization and lost productivity

  

Q

 

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

 Utilities

Quality-adjusted life years EuroQol-5D

 

Q

  

Q

Q

Q

Q

 Outcomes

CGH frequency (days) and intensity (in last 4 wks)

Q

D, Q

 

D

D

D

D

D

Tertiary Objective

Effects of Expectations

 Quantitative

Confidence in treatment success

 

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

Q

 

Perceptions of the Patient-provider encounter

  

Q

Q

    

 Qualitative

Meaning, constructs of expectations

   

I

    
  1. Key: BL baseline, SMT spinal manipulation therapy, W weeks, CGH cervicogenic headache, Q questionnaire, D diary, I interview, X indicates occurrence