Skip to main content
Download PDF

The factors and motivations behind United Kingdom chiropractic professional association membership: a survey of the Welsh Institute of Chiropractic Alumni

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies volume 24, Article number: 35 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There are many professional associations representing chiropractors and chiropractic in the United Kingdom (UK). Each has its unique selling points (USPs) and chiropractors can choose to join as many as they like; however, cost of membership has to be weighed against perceived benefits. The predictors of UK chiropractic association membership and motivational factors to join these associations, have not formally been identified. This research study aimed to identify some of the factors and motivations in Welsh Institute of Chiropractic (WIOC) Alumni regarding their decision to join (or not) a UK chiropractic professional association.

Methods

An online survey instrument, comprising 23 questions, was administered from November-December 2015 via a link announced on ‘The WIOC Alumni’ Facebook group (N = 655), the active platform for the WIOC Alumni Organisation.

Results

One hundred forty-eight respondents (approximately 22.6 % of ‘The WIOC Alumni’ Facebook group membership) completed the survey. Ten factors were reported to be important in decision making: ‘promoting public awareness of chiropractic’ (91.2 %), ‘access to professional indemnity insurance’ (89.2 %), ‘overall professionalism of the association’ (87.2 %), ‘the identity of the association’ (77.7 %), ‘positive attitude to research’ (77.0 %), ‘workplace support and advice’ (68.9 %), ‘access to events \ courses \ seminars’ (64.2 %), ‘Continuing Professional Development (CPD) activities’ (62.2 %), ‘cost of membership’ (59.5 %) and ‘addresses my area of interest’ (56.1 %). ‘Many of my friends have joined’ (71.6 %) was considered unimportant, whereas ‘Lobbying: Influencing policy’ and ‘career development’ were considered important by almost twice as many as those that consider them unimportant (45.3 %: 25.7 % and 43.9 %: 27.0 % respectively), ‘requirement of employment’ and ‘associations newsletter’ were seen as unimportant by roughly twice as many as those considering them important (44.6 %: 28.4 % and 35.8 %: 28.4 % respectively). Should it become an option, almost 71 % of respondents would support the unification of the four main UK chiropractic associations, (the British, McTimoney, Scottish and United, Chiropractic Associations: BCA MCA, SCA and UCA, respectively).

Conclusions

Several factors have an important effect on motivations to join UK chiropractic professional associations. Further research is required to determine if this is WIOC specific or can be extrapolated more generally.

Background

A professional association can be defined as a body of persons engaged in the same profession. Its uses include controlling entry into the profession, maintaining standards, and representing the profession in discussions with other bodies [1]. Professional associations are generally considered to be bodies which give a form of identification and organisation within fields of professional practice. These associations facilitate field knowledge, provide normative frameworks for practice and serve as catalysts for change [2, 3]. For the purposes of this research, ‘professional association’ will be used as an overarching umbrella term encompassing professional membership bodies, research bodies, the Associations and other organisations that function to facilitate development of chiropractors and chiropractic.

The literature reveals a general consensus that the establishment of a professional association is an essential step for achieving and maintaining a professional status and indeed a profession [4–9]. The credibility of a profession is generally considered to be a measure of both the vitality and credibility of its associations [7]. A stronger, more engaged membership serves to benefit not only the organisation, in advancing the profession, but also can positively impact on the professional development of the membership [5, 7].

UK chiropractic professional associations

It has been acknowledged in the literature that the chiropractic profession has been plagued throughout its history by internal ideologically-based strife [10–14]. Effects of this can be seen in the UK, where a range of chiropractic professional associations compete with each other for members, however, the theme of being stronger together (unity) is apparent [12, 15–17]. At the British Association of Chiropractic Students (BACS) 2015 conference [18], the leaders of the main UK chiropractic associations, the British, McTimoney, and United, (the Scottish gave their apologies) Chiropractic Associations (BCA MCA, UCA, and SCA respectively), participated in an inter-association debate, discussing ‘unity’. These associations agreed to the principle of unification of the four main UK chiropractic associations (BCA, MCA, SCA and UCA) sometime in the future [18]. How, when and if this will ever be achieved is currently undecided. Table 1 provides an overview of the main chiropractic professional associations within the UK, including, for the purpose of this research, the professional association ‘type’.

Table 1 UK chiropractic professional associations
Full size table

Many professional associations representing chiropractors and chiropractic exist in the United Kingdom (UK). Each purports to have its own unique selling points (USPs) and chiropractors can choose to be a member of as many as they like. However, in the current economic climate cost of membership has to be weighed against perceived benefits. There appear to be many benefits and, thus, motivators to joining a professional association [19]. The five main motivators for membership relate to perception of: the cost to benefit ratio, the organisation’s role as an advocate for professional issues, the perception that the organisation’s operation is fair and that members’ views are taken into account, value of the annual meeting, and that professional identify and status are enhanced by membership [19]. A variety of other factors have also been identified including, but not limited to: journal quality, networking opportunities and access to professional liability insurance, developing new skills and competencies, professional/career development, Continuing Professional Development (CPD) activities, mentoring opportunities, keeping abreast of contemporary topics through newsletters and or associated journals [4, 20].

At present, little data exists regarding what motivates United Kingdom (UK) registered chiropractors and chiropractic students to join UK chiropractic professional associations. Similarly, predictors of UK chiropractic professional association membership have not formally been identified. As with any professional association membership other important considerations include the alignment with an appropriate professional identity and training [4] and a variety of personal and environmental forces (including economics) which affect degree of active participation in, and donation to, professional associations [2, 21]. In all of these areas, there has been little chiropractic specific research published to date.

In some professional associations there is no choice element in relation to membership. One such example is membership of the General Chiropractic Council (GCC): in order to practice as a chiropractor in the UK, membership of the GCC is mandatory. Therefore, along with educational institutional alumni, where membership is automatic, these are excluded as professional associations for the purposes of this study. Only those UK chiropractic professional associations where membership is discretionary have been considered in this research.

This research study was conducted through a bespoke online survey to determine some of the factors and motivations of UK chiropractic professional association membership in Welsh Institute of Chiropractic (WIOC) Alumni regarding their decision to join (or not) a UK chiropractic professional association. A question was also posed regarding supporting the unification of the four main UK chiropractic associations, should it become an option sometime in the future.

Methods

Survey development

The survey instrument was developed by the authors between June and November 2015, with consideration of previously implemented instruments that examined motivations and predictors of membership [2, 5–7, 22, 23]. Questions were further developed using published literature [4, 8, 19, 24–26].

The survey instrument was designed taking into account best design principles and methodology including formatting content and presentation [27–29] and further designed in a manner to combat survey fatigue [27, 30].

It was deemed that the question of motivation be asked of a single group with a common educational background initially, in order to reduce the impact of variables associated with the more subtle educational influences across institutions. ‘The WIOC Alumni’ Facebook group [31], the active platform for the WIOC Alumni Organisation, was considered the most appropriate method of contacting a reasonably large proportion of the WIOC graduates. (Please note WIOC is the base for the chiropractic undergraduate programme at the University of South Wales: previously the University of Glamorgan until 2013).

Face validity was performed using WIOC faculty members and graduates from the 2015, 2006, and 2005 cohorts.

The final survey instrument totalled 23 questions, 21 of which were mandatory and two optional, covering demographics, memberships, factors and motivations. One question related to unification of the four main UK chiropractic associations: British Chiropractic Association, McTimoney Chiropractic Association, Scottish Chiropractic Association and United Chiropractic Association (BCA, MCA, SCA and UCA, respectively). The survey was constructed to be completed within five - ten minutes. Question types consisted of: multiple choice (n = 16), Likert scale (5-point: n = 1), free text (n = 2), selection list (n = 1) and multiple answer (n = 3). A copy of the final survey instrument can be found as an Additional file 1.

Survey administration and data management

The online instrument was delivered using Bristol Online Surveys (BOS; University of Bristol) with a link to the survey uploaded to ‘The WIOC Alumni’ Facebook group, the active platform for the WIOC Alumni Organisation.

Inclusion criteria: any member of ‘The WIOC Alumni’ Facebook group (not necessarily a WIOC graduate).

Exclusion criteria: non-chiropractic educated member of ‘The WIOC Alumni’ Facebook group.

The survey ran for a one month period from Wednesday the 4th November 2015 through to the close of Friday the 4th December 2015. Five formal reminders were issued during this period, in line with the periodicity of follow-up mailings noted by Sánchez-Fernández, Muñoz-Leiva and Montoro-Ríos [32].

All data was collected and stored anonymously via BOS. No individuals were identified in this research study and consent to take part was implied by completion and submission of the survey.

Data analysis

Results were downloaded from BOS directly into SPSS (version 22, IBM) for statistical analysis. Normality tests were performed confirming the data was not normally distributed.

Measures of the factors and motivations were derived by collapsing both the lower and upper Likert scale 5-point categories to clarify the ‘unimportant’ and ‘important’ relationships for analysis. Thus the 5-point Likert scale became a 3-point Likert scale of ‘unimportant’, ‘moderately important’ and ‘important’.

Results

Proportion of respondents

One hundred and forty eight members of the total recorded WIOC Alumni Facebook membership of 655 (22.6 %, as of 4th December 2015) returned fully completed surveys. Of these, four respondents were non-WIOC graduates and 20 respondents were final year WIOC students.

The WIOC has graduated 917 chiropractors from its launch in 1997, (with inaugural graduation year 2001), up to the end of the 2015 year, with 447 being male and 470 being female: additionally, there have been six known deaths of WIOC graduates. Graduated respondents ranged from the 2001 (0.7 %) to the 2015 (6.8 %) cohorts (graduated cohorts response rate ranged from 0.7–11.5 %), with a median of 6.8 % and average of 5.6 %. The 2016 final year student cohort represented a 12.8 % response. In total 71 males and 77 females completed the survey.

Following making adjustments, such as removing student status respondents and those who graduated from educational institutions other than WIOC, a total of 124 WIOC graduates had successfully completed this survey representing a 13.6 % actual response rate of known living WIOC graduates.

Membership of associations

Table 2 shows responses regarding student and graduate membership of the UK chiropractic professional associations, (multiple responses could be given). On graduation, 88.8 % were a member of a UK chiropractic professional association: with the BCA (approximately 50 %), RCC (approximately 20 %) and UCA (approximately 15 %) being the three main target UK chiropractic professional associations of WIOC Alumni; both when a student and upon graduation.

Table 2 UK chiropractic professional association membership in the WIOC Alumni
Full size table

The majority of respondents reported the following factors to be important in their decision making: ‘promoting public awareness of chiropractic’ (91.2 %), ‘access to professional indemnity insurance’ (89.2 %), ‘overall professionalism of the association’ (87.2 %), ‘the identity of the association’ (77.7 %), ‘positive attitude to research’ (77.0 %), ‘workplace support and advice’ (68.9 %), ‘access to events\courses\seminars’ (64.2 %), ‘Continuing Professional Development (CPD) activities’ (62.2 %), ‘cost of membership’ (59.5 %) and ‘addresses my area of interest’ (56.1 %). ‘Lobbying: Influencing policy’ and ‘career development’ were considered important by almost twice as many as those that consider them unimportant (45.3 %: 25.7 % and 43.9 %: 27.0 % respectively: see Table 3 for more details). In contrast, ‘many of my friends have joined’ was considered unimportant (71.6 %), ‘requirement of employment’ and ‘associations newsletter’ were seen as unimportant by roughly twice as many as those considering them important (44.6 %: 28.4 % and 35.8 %: 28.4 % respectively).

Table 3 Factors influencing WIOC Alumni to join UK chiropractic professional associations
Full size table

Additional free text factors included: philosophy and ethos, style of practice and prescribing rights.

Two thirds (66.9 %) of respondents agree that membership in any professional association is one of the hallmarks of a professional person; 33.1 % disagreed. Over three quarters (78.4 %) of the respondents agreed that chiropractic professional associations increase the visibility of the chiropractic profession within the UK; 21.6 % disagreed. If a suitable company providing indemnity insurance was available, just over one third (35.1 %) of respondents would forgo membership of the existing UK chiropractic associations. (See Table 4 for a further breakdown of the above results).

Table 4 Additional membership factors and motivators of the whole cohort
Full size table

Excluding membership as a student, nearly one third (31.1 %) of respondents have resigned or not renewed membership of a UK chiropractic association. The reasons given in free text included: cost, perceived poor value for money, lack of perceived benefit, philosophy, high insurance, limited access to seminars and CPD, disagreed with aspects of promotion of the profession, identity, lack of support, due to clinic requirements, poor service, conference focus, politics and relocating.

Approximately two fifths of respondents had been a member of a UK chiropractic professional association for 1–5 years (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Duration of membership. Histogram showing data indicating the length of time (excluding any student membership) that graduated WIOC alumni chiropractors reported having been a member of a UK chiropractic association

Full size image

Almost 71 % of respondents would support the unification of the four main chiropractic associations, (BCA, MCA, SCA and UCA), should it become an option sometime in the future. 29 % would not support this.

Discussion

An aspect of the professional associations somewhat specific to UK chiropractic, when compared with say law or medicine, is the number of professional associations that work in the “interest” of chiropractic and perhaps more significantly, compete for the relatively small number of chiropractors within the UK. Indeed, the survey results suggest that the BCA is not only the longest established of the UK chiropractic professional associations, but in the case of the WIOC Alumni, represents the majority (approximately 50 %) of respondents, far in advance of the other, younger UK chiropractic professional associations: namely the RCC (approximately 20 %) and UCA (approximately 15 %). This fits with presumed UK association membership figures taken from Fikar, Edlund and Newell [33].

Regarding those actual factors which might tip the decision regarding which association to join, ‘access to professional indemnity insurance’ rated the second most important factor at 89.2 %. Interestingly, just over a third (35.1 %) of respondents reported they would be willing to forgo membership of the existing chiropractic associations, if a suitable company providing indemnity insurance existed: it is worth mentioning that such companies do exist. Slightly in advance of this, at 91.2 %, was ‘promoting public awareness of chiropractic’. This concurs with the responses of a US school counsellors group study regarding factors affecting their choice to join or not join their professional organisations [23]. Questions asked included 1) ‘membership in professional organisations is one of the hallmarks of a professional person’ (results: 68.7 % agree: 31.3 disagree) and 2) ‘professional organisations increase the visibility of the profession’ (results: 89.2 % agree: 10.8 % disagree); showing a very similar proportional distribution to the results reported here.

Furthermore, despite the fact that the majority (88.8 %) of respondents were, upon graduation, a member of a UK chiropractic professional association, nearly one third (31.1 %) reported having actually resigned or more passively, not renewed membership of a UK chiropractic professional association for a variety of reasons. A similar study of pharmacy students reported comparable responses and response rates to discontinuing membership [5]. Reasons reported by pharmacy students for discontinuing membership included: lack of perceived benefit, cost, the organisation not aligning with his/her area of interest, unprofessional behaviour by organisations leadership, lack of organised activity by the organisation, and several logistical reasons echoing the results reported here.

Over and above differences of opinion, philosophy and identity [10–14], one further barrier to the unification of the four main UK chiropractic associations is in educational standards, namely, European Council of Chiropractic Education (ECCE) accreditation. The McTimoney College of Chiropractic (MCC) is not currently ECCE accredited and therefore MCC graduates cannot be members of the BCA [34]. However, the MCC did recently win its appeal against the decision of the ECCE Commission on Accreditation (CoA) not to accredit the program (referred to as crediting the college on their Facebook page [35]). The CoA resolved to commission a new evaluation report based on a new evaluation visit, however the MCC, as at the 16th December 2015, is not willing to proceed further with this process [35].

In the course of this research project many themes/topics within chiropractic have been touched upon, including: professionalism, education, leadership, research, legislation, lobbying, unity, identity, philosophy and ethos, style of practice and prescribing rights. All are factors and motivations influencing joining (or not) UK chiropractic professional associations. It will be interesting to see over time, if unification of the four main UK chiropractic associations happens. Could these associations merge and sit under, for example the Royal College of Chiropractic (RCC) or alternatively, perhaps the Alliance of UK Chiropractors (AUKC) could serve as a vehicle. Such a unification may never come to pass, as differences in opinion and a range of viewpoints will probably continue to exist. Time will tell, however, the area is definitely in need of further research.

Limitations of study

There are several limitations to this study. The potential impact of response and non-response bias must be considered. The response rates are suggestive of a trend: those who graduated in the early years since WIOC’s founding are not well represented, perhaps because they do not use Facebook and/or motivational issues [36]. Additionally, it is possible that alumni who are members of a UK chiropractic professional association will be more likely to complete the questionnaire than those who are not. Likewise, it may be that some professional associations have more vociferous/motivated members than others, and also similarly, those that answered could hold polarised views [36].

Furthermore, a significant limitation is the estimated 77.4 % non-response rate from ‘The WIOC Alumni’ Facebook group. Although the 22.6 % response rate does allow for conclusions to be drawn regarding the motivations and factors in the respondents, the WIOC Alumni is not represented in its entirety. This leads to less than robust confidence in the generalisation of the factors and motivations to the wider profession. Moreover, the results describe the (biased) sample.

Similarly, ‘The WIOC Alumni’ Facebook group membership is primarily comprised of WIOC graduates, but includes some final year WIOC students and other interested parties (who are not necessarily WIOC graduates). This has the potential outcome to skew the results.

Additionally, there are limits to generalising across any professional associations and indeed across UK chiropractic professional associations, which this study did. The term ‘professional association‘(for the purposes of this research) was intended as an umbrella term encompassing a variety of professional organisations ‘type’. This overarching use may have confused, raised bias and limited the results, especially when Association not preceded by ‘Professional’ within the field of UK chiropractic generally refers to the main four associations, BCA, MCA, SCA and UCA (who act like Trade Unions). Indeed, each UK chiropractic professional association is a unique entity, offering differing USPs, products, services and benefits, even though there are similarities. What is more, this research relied on published literature (not limited to the field of healthcare) with central themes of ‘professional organisations’ and ‘factors and motivations’ and what is applicable to one profession, or field, may not be specific enough for another [2]. It can be argued that there is strength in unity/numbers. There are a relatively small number of chiropractors within the UK, therefore, it appears sensible to suggest that unification of the four main chiropractic associations could positively impact on the professional development of the members, benefiting not only the organisation but aiding in advancing the profession as a whole. Regardless of the positives, unification may never come to pass, the differences in opinion and a range of viewpoints of a hard-line minority always exist. Further research is warranted to develop a greater understanding of this issue and to determine what might be best for the profession going forward.

The authors acknowledge limitations imposed by the administration and delivery of the survey instrument through the online platform. Disadvantages of an online survey instrument include the aforementioned: bias, survey fatigue, issues relating to ensuring representative sample and size, days and time of reminders; and privacy issues/anonymity. Such surveys are impersonal, and require very clear answer instructions. Additionally, respondents may experience frustration, particularly in relation to mandatory questions [27–30, 32, 36, 37]. Furthermore, Bristol Online Surveys (BOS) does not prevent a survey from being completed many times on the same computer or from the same IP address unless survey access control is utilised.

Survey design, formatting and question layout are of paramount importance. The final survey itself, contained minor typographical errors, which were not picked up during the validation stages. Additional to this and all questionnaires are those unavoidable limitations of the study design including: unexpected interpretational differences between respondents, perceived question ambiguity and even false reporting (conscious or subconscious/intentional or not) by the respondents [36].

Recommendations

While being a snapshot of the current situation for those who responded, this survey could serve as a starting point for further work in this area. Future studies in this field will not only be of interest to the chiropractic profession, but potentially to other health care professionals as well.

Further research is required to determine if the results presented here are WIOC alumni specific or can be extrapolated more generally. It is also important to look more closely at what the UK chiropractic professional associations actually offer, along with further exploration of the perspectives, influences, motivations and other such factors.

Greater knowledge of the factors and motivations for membership can help UK chiropractic professional associations engage more efficiently with the wider profession as well as their own members and can help associations promote chiropractic, market, recruit and retain members more effectively. Although i is hoped in the future to open the survey to include the alumni of the other UK chiropractic educational institutions and the members of UK chiropractic professional associations, it would be interesting to determine which of these motivators are present internationally.

Conclusions

Several factors have an important effect on motivations to join (or not) UK chiropractic professional associations. Those considered as strongly motivating to join included: ‘promoting public awareness of chiropractic’ (91.2 %), ‘access to professional indemnity insurance’ (89.2 %), ‘overall professionalism of the association’ (87.2 %), ‘the identity of the association’ (77.7 %), ‘positive attitude to research’ (77.0 %) and ‘workplace support and advice’ (68.9 %).

Future studies in this field will not only be of interest to the chiropractic profession, but potentially to other health care professionals as well. More research is required to determine how representative WIOC views are of the chiropractic profession as a whole both in the UK and further afield.

Unity is a theme in chiropractic, from this limited sample, the majority of respondents to this survey would support unification of the four main UK chiropractic associations, should this become an option sometime in the future.

Abbreviations

AECC, Anglo European College of Chiropractic; AUKC, Alliance of UK Chiropractors; BACS, British Association of Chiropractic Students; BCA, British Chiropractic Association; BOS, Bristol Online Surveys; BVCA, British Veterinary Chiropractic Association; CoA, Commission on Accreditation; CPD, Continuing Professional Development; CRC, Chiropractic Research Council; EAC, European Academy of Chiropractic; ECCE, European Council on Chiropractic Education; FICS, The International Federation of Sports Chiropractic / Fédération Internationale de Chiropratique du Sport; GCC, General Chiropractic Council; MCA, McTimoney Chiropractic Association; MCC, McTimoney College of Chiropractic; RCC, Royal College of Chiropractors; SCA, Scottish Chiropractic Association; UCA, United Chiropractic Association; UK, United Kingdom; USPs, unique selling points; WIOC, Welsh Institute of Chiropractic

References

  1. Collins. ‘Professional Association’, Collins Dictionary. 2016. Available at: http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/professional-association (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

  2. Hager M. Engagement motivations in professional associations. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2013;43(2 Suppl):39S–60S. doi:10.1177/0899764013502582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rusaw A. Learning by association: professional associations as learning agents. Hum Resour Dev Q. 1995;6(2):215–26. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920060209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Escoffery C, Kenzig M, Hyden C. Getting the most out of professional associations. Health Promot Pract. 2015;16(3):309–12. doi:10.1177/1524839914566654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fusco N, Prescott G, Prescott W. Motivations for pharmacy students to join professional organizations. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 2015;7(1):117–20. doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2014.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Phillips J, McLaughlin M, Gettig J, Fajiculay J, Advincula M. An Analysis of Motivation Factors for Students’ Pursuit of Leadership Positions. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015;79(1):08. doi:10.5688/ajpe79108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Phillips B, Leahy M. Prediction of Membership in Rehabilitation Counseling Professional Associations. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 2012;55(4):207–18. doi:10.1177/0034355212446533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mata H, Latham T, Ransome Y. Benefits of Professional Organization Membership and Participation in National Conferences: Considerations for Students and New Professionals. Health Promot Pract. 2010;11(4):450–3. doi:10.1177/1524839910370427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman A, Phillips M. Balancing strategy and accountability: A model for the governance of professional associations. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh. 2004;15(2):187–204. doi:10.1002/nml.61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McGregor M, Puhl A, Reinhart C, Injeyan H, Soave D. Differentiating intraprofessional attitudes toward paradigms in health care delivery among chiropractic factions: results from a randomly sampled survey. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14(1):51. doi:10.1186/1472-6882-14-51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Institute for Alternative Futures. Chiropractic 2025: Divergent Futures. Alexandria, VA. 2013. Available at: http://www.altfutures.org/pubs/chiropracticfutures/IAF-Chiropractic2025.pdf (Accessed 21 February 2016).

  12. Simpson J. The Five Eras of Chiropractic & the future of chiropractic as seen through the eyes of a participant observer. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 2012;20(1):1. doi:10.1186/2045-709X-20-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaptchuk T, Eisenberg D. Chiropractic: origins, controversies, and contributions. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:2215–24. doi:10.1001/archinte.158.20.2215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wardwell W. Chiropractic. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. British Chiropractic Association. BCA President’s New Year Message. 2016. Available at: https://sway.com/HEHMnUOB4ZVtm070 (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

  16. British Chiropractic Association. ‘President’s Message: Stronger together’, Contact, Spring/Summer; 2015. p.5.

  17. Ogre, O. ‘Is unity important?’, ECU A blog for European Chiropractors’ Union, 7 December. 2015. Available at: http://www.ecupresidentblog.com/2015/12/is-unity-important.html?spref=fb (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

  18. British Association of Chiropractic Students (BACS) Conference. Empowering Connections. University of South Wales, 7-8 February. Wales: BACS; 2015.

  19. Skarlicki DR, Lucas C, Prociuk T, Latham GP. Factors explaining why people join, remain in, or leave a scholarly society: The Canadian Psychological Association’. Can Psychol. 2000;41:69–74. doi:10.1037/h0086858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cottrell R, Girvan J, McKenzie J. Principles & foundations of health promotion and education. San Francisco: Pearson/Benjamin Cummings; 2009. Chpt 8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smith D. Determinants of Voluntary Association Participation and Volunteering: A Literature Review. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 1994;23(3):243–63. doi:10.1177/089976409402300305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Newman M, Petrosko J. Predictors of Alumni Association Membership. Res High Educ. 2011;52(7):738–59. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9213-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bauman S. To Join or Not to Join: School Counselors as a Case Study in Professional Membership. J Couns Dev. 2008;86(2):164–77. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2008.tb00494.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tschirhart M, Gazley B. Advancing Scholarship on Membership Associations: New Research and Next Steps. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2013;43(2 Suppl):3S–17S. doi:10.1177/0899764013517052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Henkin A, Marchiori D. Empowerment and organizational commitment of chiropractic faculty. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2003;26(5):275–81. doi:10.1016/S0161-4754(03)00043-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Singer T, Hughey A. The role of the alumni association in student life. New Dir Stud Serv. 2002;2002(100):51–68. doi:10.1002/ss.70.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fan W, Yan Z. Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26(2):132–9. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Savage S, Waldman D. Learning and fatigue during choice experiments: a comparison of online and mail survey modes. J Appl Econ. 2008;23(3):351–71. doi:10.1002/jae.984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Selm M, Jankowski N. Conducting Online Surveys. Qual Quant. 2006;40(3):435–56. doi:10.1007/s11135-005-8081-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Porter S, Whitcomb M, Weitzer W. Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2004;2004(121):63–73. doi:10.1002/ir.101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. The WIOC Alumni (no date) ‘The WIOC Alumni Members’, Facebook. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/groups/wiocalumni/members/ (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

  32. Sánchez-Fernández J, Muñoz-Leiva F, Montoro-Ríos F. Improving retention rate and response quality in Web-based surveys. Comput Hum Behav. 2012;28(2):507–14. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fikar P, Edlund K, Newell D. Current preventative and health promotional care offered to patients by chiropractors in the United Kingdom: a survey. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 2015;23(1):10. doi:10.1186/s12998-015-0053-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. British Chiropractic Association (no date) Join the BCA. Available at: http://www.chiropractic-uk.co.uk/For-Chiropractors-14-Join-the-BCA-0-ms.aspx (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

  35. McTimoney Chiropractic Association. ‘McTimoney Chiropractic Association’, Facebook, 16 December. 2015. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/mctimoneychiropracticassociation/posts/961142753958449 (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

  36. Choi BC, Pak AW. A catalog of biases in questionnaires. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005;2(1):A13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. University of Exeter. ‘Creating and using online surveys’ CASCADE Briefing Paper. 2012. Available at: http://as.exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/academicservices/educationenhancement/cascade/Creating_and_using_online_surveys.pdf (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

  38. British Chiropractic Association (no date) About the BCA. Available at: http://www.chiropractic-uk.co.uk/About-About-the-BCA-76-mi.aspx (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

  39. McTimoney College of Chiropractic (no date) McTimoney Chiropractic Association. Available at: http://www.mctimoney-college.ac.uk/about/about-the-college/mctimoney-chiropractic-association/ (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

  40. Scottish Chiropractic Association (no date) Welcome to the Scottish Chiropractic Association Website. Available at: http://www.sca-chiropractic.org/ (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

  41. United Chiropractic Association (no date) About the UCA. Available at: http://www.united-chiropractic.org/about-the-uca/ (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

  42. Chiropractic Research Council http://www.crc-uk.org/ (no date) (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

  43. Royal College of Chiropractors (no date) ‘A brief history of the RCC’. Available at: http://rcc-uk.org/rcc-history/ (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

  44. United Chiropractic Association (no date) Membership Benefits. Available at: http://www.united-chiropractic.org/membership-benefits/ (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

  45. Alliance of UK Chiropractors (no date) ‘Alliance of UK Chiropractors’, Facebook. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Alliance-of-UK-Chiropractors/151897244826008?sk=info&tab=page_info (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

  46. British Veterinary Chiropractic Association (no date) Welcome to the BVCA. Available at: http://bvca-uk.org/ (Accessed: 26 January 2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the help of the WIOC alumni and its Facebook page administration for participating in this research.

Funding

The research was self-funded forming part of the requirements for MChiro degree for SW, PWM was the academic supervisor.

Availability of data and materials

Not at present.

Authors’ contributions

SW conceived the project. Both authors participated in all parts of the project from design of the questionnaire, analysis and interpretation. First draft of the paper was prepared by SW before editing and submission by PWM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. This research was conducted without influence, sponsorship, or affiliation to any chiropractic professional association.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was given approval by the Chiropractic Undergraduate Research Ethics oversight group with devolved responsibility from the Faculty of Life Sciences Ethics Sub-Committee at the University of South Wales.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Wales, Pontypridd, Mid Glamorgan, Wales, CF37 1DL, UK

    Sheena E. Wotherspoon & Peter W. McCarthy

Authors
  1. Sheena E. Wotherspoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter W. McCarthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter W. McCarthy.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

The survey instrument used in this study. (DOCX 225 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wotherspoon, S.E., McCarthy, P.W. The factors and motivations behind United Kingdom chiropractic professional association membership: a survey of the Welsh Institute of Chiropractic Alumni. Chiropr Man Therap 24, 35 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0115-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0115-x

Keywords

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies

ISSN: 2045-709X