Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of studies included in the quantitative synthesis

From: Mixed methods systematic review of the literature base exploring working alliance in the chiropractic profession

Study reference number

Country

Participants

Methods of data collection

Methods of data analysis

[71]

United States (US)

343 Pregnant patients

Questionnaires

Descriptive statistics and the paired t test

[53]

Canada

69 Military personnel presenting for on-site chiropractic services

Questionnaire

Multivariable regression model

[34]

US

20 Patients with low back pain

Questionnaires

Student's t-test

[44]

Canada

6 Chiropractors licensed with the College of Chiropractors of British Columbia

Questionnaire

Descriptive statistics

[72]

US

20 Institutions provided a written copy of the Informed consent documents

Retrieving Informed Consent (IC) documents

IC were compared against a list of requirements

[73]

United Kingdom (UK)

509 Participants from four participating UK associations

Telephone survey

Pearson Chi-Square tests

[74]

Australia

153 Patients with chronic conditions

Questionnaires

Descriptive and summary statistics

[75]

US

1759 Adults in the United States population

Questionnaire

Descriptive and multivariate methods

[76]

US

66 Questionnaires were returned from new and established patients

Questionnaire

Not explicitly specified

[54]

US

400 Participants with chronic low back pain

Questionnaire

Path analysis

[77]

US

681 Patients randomized, 341 were assigned to the 2 chiropractic groups

Questionnaires at baseline and 2 weeks of treatment

Mixed linear modelling

[55]

US

Same trial as in the study of Hertzman-Miller et al. [77]

Questionnaires

Multiple logistic and linear regression modelling

[35]

Australia

144 Patients seeing chiropractors with practices in diverse locations

Questionnaires

Not explicitly specified

[36]

Australia

9 Chiropractors and 173 patients participated

Questionnaires

Descriptive statistics

[49]

The Netherlands

89 Chiropractors, 207 patient–chiropractor working relationships

Questionnaires

A one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) test

[78]

US

72 Chiropractors who worked in 61 chiropractic practices

Questionnaire

Regression analysis

[55]

Canada

2597 Patients participating in a collaborative study

Questionnaires

A multiple linear regression model

[38]

US

A sample of 57 people, who made a total of 104 office visits between them

(1) Audiotape of all clinical interaction of the chiropractor for 8 days (2) patient questionnaires pertaining to satisfaction with care

(1) Data was content analysed using the modified Bales method of process analysis [69]. (2) descriptive statistics

[79]

UK

465 Practitioners of which 132 chiropractors (28%)

Questionnaires

Several multivariate analyses of variance (ANOVA)

[52]

US

541 New and returning chiropractic patients

Questionnaires

Multiple stepwise regression analysis

[80]

Sweden

30 Chiropractors and 336 patients from 17 private practices

Questionnaires

The Wilcoxon signed rank test

[81]

US

62 Chronic pain patients recruited from four chiropractic offices

Questionnaires

Series of multiple regression analyses

[41]

Canada

90 Participants were recruited from two private chiropractic clinics

Questionnaire

Descriptive statistics