Skip to main content

Table 1 Rankings of validity studies per QUADAS scores

From: Review of methods used by chiropractors to determine the site for applying manipulation

Article ID

Percentile

Rank

Article ID

Percentile

Rank

Abbott_2003

78

19

King_2007

77

20

Abbott_2005

92

6

Knutson_2002

77

21

Abbott_2006

100

1

Landel_2008

90

8

Beattie_1990

83

14

Laslet_2003

73

28

Bierma-Zeinstra_2001

90

8

Laslet_2005

94

2

Brismee_2006

41

40

Leach_1993

91

7

Bryner_1994

64

31

Lebeouf_1990

75

26

Caruso_2000

27

44

Leboeuf-Yde_2000

93

3

Chafetz_1988

76

24

Leboeuf-Yde_2002

100

1

Chakraverty_2007

85

10

Lehman_2002

77

23

Cibulka 1999

35

41

Levangie_1999

92

5

Cooperstein_2003

59

35

McCulloch_1993

100

1

Cooperstein_2004

84

11

Montgomery_1995

55

37

Dankaerts_2006

78

18

Nansel_1988

64

32

Diakow_1988

48

38

Ogince_2007

78

17

Erikson_1996

32

43

Osterbauer_1996

33

42

Fernandez-de-las-Pinas _2005

57

36

Peterson_2008

77

22

Fortin_1997

45

39

Petrone_2003

93

4

Fritz_2011

83

12

Phillips_1996

100

1

Fryer_2010

69

29

Pollard_2006

84

11

Haas&Peterson_1992

75

25

Roy_2008

87

9

Harlick_2007

79

16

Sandmark_1995

90

8

Harrison_1998

64

33

Taylor_1990

83

13

Harrison_2003

92

5

Viitanen_2000

83

12

Harrison_2004

62

34

Yamashita_2002

67

30

Humphreys_2004

84

11

Zaproudina_2006

74

27

Imoto_2007

83

15

   

Jende_1997

92

6

   

Jull_1988

100

1

   
  1. Summary scores (not shown) were generated using weightings of QUADAS checklist items, where weights of individual items were based on the inverse of their prevalence within this cohort of articles. Subsequently, articles were ranked according to their normalized (Percentile) score and their relative position (Rank) within this cohort of articles.