Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality scores of the included studies

From: What is the clinical course of transient synovitis in children: a systematic review of the literature

Authors

Criteria

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Score

Quality

Uziel 2006 [30]

+

1

Low

Skinner 2002 [3]

+

+

+

+

+

5

High

Kermond 2002 [18]

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

7

High

Fischer 1999 [4]

+

+

+

+

+

5

High

Mattick 1999 [27]

+

+

+

3

Low

Eggl 1999 [12]

+

+

+

+

+

+

6

High

De Pellegrin 1997 [11]

+

+

+

+

4

Low

Kesteris 1996 [19]

+

+

+

+

+

+

6

High

Keenan 1996 [17]

+

+

+

+

+

5

High

Taylor 1995 [29]

+

+

2

Low

Gopakumar 1992 [2]

+

+

+

3

Low

Terjesen 1991 [22]

+

+

+

+

+

+

6

High

Briggs 1990 [23]

+

+

+

+

+

5

High

Hasegawa 1988 [14]

+

+

+

+

+

5

High

Kallio 1988 [16]

+

+

+

+

+

+

6

High

Landin 1987 [1]

+

+

+

+

4

Low

Egund 1987 [13]

+

+

+

+

+

5

High

Kallio 1986 [15]

+

+

+

+

+

+

6

High

Haueisen 1986 [24]

+

+

+

+

4

Low

Mukamel 1985 [20]

+

+

+

+

+

5

High

Illingworth 1983 [25]

+

1

Low

Sharwood 1981 [28]

+

1

Low

Calver 1981 [10]

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

7

High

Mallet 1981 [26]

+

+

+

+

4

Low

Stock 1977 [21]

+

+

+

+

4

Low

  1. + the criterion was satisfied; – the criterion was not satisfied or it was unclear. Quality criteria: 1) Sample definition given (at least 4 of: age, male–female ratio, in-and exclusion criteria, duration of symptoms prior to submission, diagnostic criteria for transient synovitis), 2) Prospective design, 3) Inception cohort 4) Treatment subsequent to inclusion in cohort is described, 5) Follow-up data available from at least 80% of study population, or reason for loss of follow-up is known, 6) Same duration of follow-up for all patients (maximum range of 30%), or if patients have been followed by a protocol that defines end of follow-up, 7) Same tests used for all patients with transient synovitis during follow-up.