Study | Sample size, participant demographics | Reference standard and method | Location IAS relative to thoracic SP* | Method of transforming data, if any | ModifiedQUADAS score (n/14) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cooperstein, 2007 [43] | n = 34, 59% male; mean Y/O = 26; all healthy | Radio-opaque marker placed on ISA, compared with spinal radiography | T6: 5.9% | n/a | 11 |
T7: 17.6% | |||||
T8: 47.1% | |||||
T9: 26.5% | |||||
T10: 2.9 | |||||
Haneline, 2008 [40] | n = 50, 50% male; mean Y/O = 47.5; health status unknown | Radiographic mensuration of scapula and spine | T6: 8.0% | Left and right scapular positions averaged | n/a |
T7: 26.0% | |||||
T8: 56.0 | |||||
T9: 10.0% | |||||
Teoh, 2009 [4] | n = 104, 54.8% male; mean Y/O; receiving chest radiography | Radio-opaque marker placed on ISA, compared with spinal radiography | T6: 1.0% | n/a | 14 |
T7: 9.6% | |||||
T8: 30.8% | |||||
T9: 36.5% | |||||
T10: 16.3% | |||||
T11: 5.8% | |||||
Arzola, 2011 [1] | n = 55, 41.8% male; mean Y/O 30.7; all healthy | Ultrasonography | T6: 3.6% | Intervertebral space findings apportioned equally to segments above and below | 13 |
T7: 12.7% | |||||
T8: 29.1% | |||||
T9: 29.1% | |||||
T10: 16.4% | |||||
T11: 9.1% | |||||
Kim, 2012 [3] | n = 100, 33% male; mean Y/O = 49.3; all symptomatic, variety of conditions | Epidural insertion level as seen on radiography | T5: 1% | Subtracted 1 spinal level to account for use of epidural position | 14 |
T6: 1% | |||||
T7: 25% | |||||
T8: 62% | |||||
T9: 10% | |||||
T10: 1% |