Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of methodological assessment of the 49 included studies

From: Clinical examination findings as prognostic factors in low back pain: a systematic review of the literature

Author and year of publication

Study participation

Study attrition

Prognostic factor measurement

Outcome measurement

Analysis/reporting of results

Risk of bias assessment

Albert et al. (2012) [25]

Yes

Unsure

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Amundsen et al. (2000) [26]

Unsure

Partly

Unsure

No

No

High

Bendix et al. (1998) [27]

Yes

Partly

Unsure

Yes

Partly

Moderate

Bergquist-Ullman et al. (1977) [28]

Yes

Unsure

Yes

Yes

Partly

Moderate

Burton et al. (1991) [29]

Yes

Partly

No

No

Partly

High

Burton et al. (1995) [30]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Partly

Moderate

Campello et al. (2006) [31]

No

Yes

Partly

Yes

Yes

Moderate

Christiansen et al. (2010) [32]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Coste et al. (1994) [33]

Yes

Unsure

Unsure

Unsure

Partly

High

Dwornik et al. (2007) [34]

Unsure

Unsure

Unsure

Partly

No

High

Enthoven et al. (2003) [35]

Yes

Partly

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Ferreira et al. (2009) [36]

Partly

Unsure

Yes

Yes

Yes

Moderate

Flynn et al. (2002) [37]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Partly

Yes

Low

Fritz et al. (2004) [40]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Partly

Yes

Low

Fritz et al. (2007) [38]

Unsure

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Fritz et al. (2005) [39]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Gaines et al. (1999) [41]

Yes

Unsure

Yes

Partly

Yes

Moderate

Ghahreman et al. (2011) [42]

Yes

Unsure

Unsure

Yes

Partly

High

Grotle et al. (2005) [44]

Unsure

Yes

Unsure

Yes

Partly

Moderate

Grotle et al. (2007) [43]

Unsure

Yes

Unsure

Yes

Partly

Moderate

Gurcay et al. (2009) [45]

Partly

Yes

Unsure

Yes

Partly

Moderate

Hicks et al. (2005) [46]

Unsure

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Hildebrandt et al. (1997) [47]

Partly

Yes

Unsure

Partly

Partly

High

Hurri et al. (1989) [48]

No

Partly

Unsure

Yes

Yes

High

Indahl et al. (1998) [49]

Unsure

Yes

Partly

Unsure

Partly

High

Infante-Rivard et al. (1996) [50]

Yes

Partly

No

Unsure

Yes

High

Jamison et al. (1991) [51]

Unsure

No

Unsure

Yes

No

High

Karas et al. (1997) [52]

Yes

Partly

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Kool et al. (2002) [53]

Unsure

Yes

Yes

Partly

Yes

Moderate

Leboeuf-Yde et al. (2004) [54]

Yes

Partly

Unsure

Yes

Yes

Low

Long et al. (1995) [55]

Yes

Unsure

Yes

Partly

Partly

High

Lonnberg (2010) [56]

Unsure

Unsure

Unsure

Yes

Yes

High*

Luoto et al. (1998) [57]

Unsure

Yes

No

No

No

High

McIntosh et al. (2000) [58]

Unsure

Yes

Unsure

Yes

Yes

Moderate

Milhous et al. (1989) [60]

No

Partly

No

Partly

No

High

Michaelson et al. (2004) [59]

Yes

Yes

Partly

Yes

Yes

Low

Pedersen (1980) [61]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Unsure

No

High

Polatin et al. (1989) [62]

Unsure

Unsure

Unsure

Yes

Partly

High

Roland (1983) [63]

Unsure

Yes

Yes

Unsure

No

High

Sandström et al. (1986) [64]

Yes

Yes

Partly

Yes

No

High

Schiøtt-Christensen et a (1999) [65]

Yes

Yes

Unsure

Yes

Yes

Low**

Medium***

Seferlis et al. (2000) [66]

Unsure

Partly

Partly

Partly

Yes

High

Skytte et al. (2005) [67]

Yes

Unsure

Yes

Yes

Partly

Moderate

Sweetman et al. (1996) [68]

Unsure

Unsure

Unsure

Unsure

No

High

Valls et al. (2001) [29]

Yes

Unsure

Unsure

Partly

Yes

Moderate

Van den Hoogen et al. (1997) [70]

Yes

Partly

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Vendrig et al. (1999) [71]

Yes

Partly

Unsure

Yes

No

High

Vroomen et al. (2002) [72]

Unsure

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Low

Werneke et al. (1993) [73]

Yes

Unsure

Yes

Partly

Partly

High

  1. *for our purpose, **for 1 + 6 months follow-up, ***for 1 year follow-up.