Skip to main content

Table 7 Response frequency and means of Facilitators of EBP uptake items (Part F of E-BASE)

From: US chiropractors’ attitudes, skills and use of evidence-based practice: A cross-sectional national survey

PART F Items

Not useful (1)

Slightly useful (2)

Moderately useful (3)

Very useful (4)

Mean (Range = 1-4)

Access to the Internet in your workplace

3.4%

5.2%

13.5%

77.9%

3.7

Access to free online databases in the workplace, such as Cochrane and PubMed

2.0%

8.9%

18.9%

70.2%

3.6

Ability to download full-text / full-length journal articles

2.1%

11.5%

20.9%

65.5%

3.5

Access to online education materials related to evidence based practice

1.4%

9.3%

23.7%

65.6%

3.5

Access to critical reviews of research evidence relevant to your field (these are critical reviews of multiple research papers addressing a single topic)

1.8%

11.3%

31.4%

55.5%

3.4

Free access to online databases that usually require license fees, such as DynaMed and CINAHL

6.9%

15.1%

19.7%

58.3%

3.3

Access to critically appraised topics relevant to your field (these are critical appraisals of single research papers)

2.2%

15.6%

35.2%

47.0%

3.3

Access to tools used to assist the critical appraisal/evaluation of research evidence

3.4%

17.6%

36.7%

42.3%

3.2

Access to research rating tools that facilitate critical appraisal of single research papers

4.3%

21.9%

35.5%

38.3%

3.1

Access to online tools that assist you to conduct your own critical appraisals of multiple research papers related to a single topic

6.8%

22.9%

30.4%

39.9%

3.0

  1. These are responses to the question “On a scale ranging from ‘not useful’ to ‘very useful’, to what extent would the following strategies assist you in participating in EBP”?