Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the first stage of two-stage clustering of chest pain data

From: Could the clinical interpretability of subgroups detected using clustering methods be improved by using a novel two-stage approach?

Response option

 

Domain: Demographic

       

2 clusters

 

Cluster1

Cluster2

    

Scoring pattern label

 

Older

Younger

    

Cluster Size

 

51 %

49 %

    

Cluster membership probability

Median (interquartile range)

90 % (79 % to 96 %)

93 % (78 % to 100 %)

    

Age (years)

Mean (SD)

62.6 (5.2)

45.3 (6.3)

    

Gender

Female

43 %

39 %

    

Domain: Previous history

1 cluster

 

Previous history did not discriminate subgroups in two-stage clustering

Domain: Psychological

5 clusters

 

Cluster1

Cluster2

Cluster3

Cluster4

Cluster5

 

Scoring pattern label

 

Uncertain of cause of pain and fearful

Believes cause from heart

Believes both from heart and musculoskeletal

Believes cause from musculoskeletal and less fearful

Believes cause from other cause and less fearful

 

Cluster Size

 

44 %

23 %

16 %

11 %

6 %

 

Cluster membership probability

Median (interquartile range)

100 % (92 % to 100 %)

99. % (99 % to 100 %)

100 % (100 % to 100 %)

95 % (95 % to 96 %)

77 % (77 % to 100 %)

 

Self-perceived ‘Pain from muscle or joints’

No

10 %

100 %

0 %

0 %

75 %

 
 

Possibly

85 %

0 %

1 %

13 %

25 %

 
 

Yes

5 %

0 %

99 %

87 %

0 %

 

Self-perceived ‘Pain from heart’

No

15 %

0 %

0 %

99 %

94 %

 
 

Possibly

83 %

1 %

1 %

1 %

6 %

 
 

Yes

3 %

99 %

99 %

0 %

0 %

 

Self-perceived ‘Afraid’

Yes

99 %

71 %

83 %

56 %

50 %

 

Domain: Pain

2 clusters

 

Cluster1

Cluster2

    

Scoring pattern label

 

Crushing pain

Not crushing pain

    

Cluster Size

 

77 %

23 %

    

Cluster membership probability, median (interquartile range)

 

97 % (94 % to 97 %)

99 % (96 % to 99 %)

    

Episode duration

< 10 min

59 %

50 %

    
 

10 min-1 hour

20 %

20 %

    
 

> 1 hour

5 %

7 %

    
 

Continuous

16 %

24 %

    

Pain description ‘crushing pain’

Yes

100 %

25 %

    

Pain description ‘tenderness’

Yes

3 %

3 %

    

Pain description ‘sharp pains’

Yes

14 %

52 %

    

Pain description ‘well defined’

Yes

3 %

6 %

    

Pain description ‘diffuse’

Yes

6 %

5 %

    

Pain description ‘burning’

Yes

4 %

8 %

    

Pain description ‘tingling’

Yes

8 %

19 %

    

Domain: Activity limitation

3 clusters

 

Cluster1

Cluster2

Cluster3

   

Scoring pattern label

 

None or light activity limitation

Moderate activity limitation

Severe activity limitation

   

Cluster Size

 

82 %

11 %

8 %

   

Cluster membership probability, median (interquartile range)

 

100 % (100 % to 100 %)

86 % (86 % to 86 %)

99 % (82 % to 100 %)

   

SF36 physical function sum-score

Mean (SD)

71.2 (7.4)

49.0 (4.6)

27.1 (6.9)

   

Domain: Diagnostic classification

3 clusters

 

Cluster1

Cluster2

Cluster3

   

Scoring pattern label

 

Not heart

Typical angina

Maybe angina

   

Cluster Size

 

37 %

35 %

28 %

   

Cluster membership probability

Median (interquartile range)

100 % (94 % to 100 %)

100 % (85 % to 100 %)

97 % (81 % to 100 %)

   

Danish Cardiologist’s Society

No angina

64 %

3 %

2 %

   

classification ‘angina’

Typical

0 %

89 %

4 %

   
 

Atypical

1 %

8 %

65 %

   
 

Uncharacteri-stic

34 %

0 %

29 %

   
 

Unstable

0 %

1 %

0 %

   

Canadian Cardiovascular Society

Grade 0

87 %

0 %

8 %

   

classification

Grade 1

13 %

17 %

84 %

   
 

Grade 2

0 %

76 %

8 %

   
 

Grade 3

0 %

7 %

0 %

   

Domain: Palpation

6 clusters

 

Cluster1

Cluster2

Cluster3

Cluster4

Cluster5

Cluster6

Scoring pattern label

 

No palpation findings

Local 5/6 signs and intercostal tenderness

Local 2/3/4 signs and pectoral tenderness

Pectoral tenderness

Paraspinal and pectoral tenderness

Generalised tenderness

Cluster Size

 

22 %

19 %

18 %

16 %

16 %

8 %

Cluster membership probability, median (interquartile range)

 

100 % (100 % to 100 %)

100 % (100 % to 100 %)

100 % (100 % to 100 %)

100 % (100 % to 100 %)

100 % (100 % to 100 %)

100 % (100 % to 100 %)

Sternoxiphoid springing tenderness

Yes

10 %

22 %

1 %

1 %

10 %

34 %

Costosternal tenderness 2/3 right

Yes

0 %

5 %

1 %

4 %

16 %

52 %

Costosternal tenderness 2/3 left

Yes

1 %

7 %

0 %

2 %

19 %

56 %

Costosternal tenderness 3/4 right

Yes

2 %

13 %

1 %

3 %

12 %

52 %

Costosternal tenderness 3/4 left

Yes

2 %

25 %

0 %

0 %

18 %

54 %

Costosternal tenderness 4/5 right

Yes

1 %

28 %

1 %

1 %

4 %

51 %

Costosternal tenderness 4/5 left

Yes

2 %

77 %

1 %

1 %

10 %

52 %

Costosternal tenderness 5/6 right

Yes

1 %

27 %

1 %

1 %

0 %

51 %

Costosternal tenderness 5/6 left

Yes

3 %

55 %

0 %

0 %

6 %

51 %

sternoxiphoid springing pain

Yes

4 %

3 %

0 %

0 %

4 %

4 %

Costosternal springing pain 2/3 right

Yes

0 %

0 %

0 %

4 %

1 %

8 %

Costosternal springing pain 2/3 left

Yes

0 %

1 %

0 %

1 %

4 %

10 %

Costosternal springing pain 3/4 right

Yes

0 %

2 %

1 %

2 %

2 %

10 %

Costosternal springing pain 3/4 left

Yes

1 %

7 %

0 %

0 %

5 %

10 %

Costosternal springing pain 4/5 right

Yes

0 %

8 %

1 %

0 %

1 %

6 %

Costosternal springing pain 4/5 left

Yes

1 %

36 %

0 %

0 %

0 %

4 %

Costosternal springing pain 5/6 right

Yes

0 %

9 %

0 %

0 %

0 %

4 %

Costosternal springing pain 5/6 left

Yes

0 %

29 %

0 %

1 %

2 %

6 %

Muscle tenderness pectoralis major left

Tenderness

1 %

19 %

78 %

62 %

38 %

54 %

 

Pain

0 %

3 %

20 %

28 %

4 %

24 %

Muscle tenderness pectoralis minor left

Tenderness

2 %

31 %

83 %

75 %

40 %

66 %

 

Pain

0 %

6 %

13 %

8 %

4 %

20 %

Muscle tenderness intercostal 2/3 left

Tenderness

1 %

6 %

58 %

42 %

24 %

84 %

 

Pain

1 %

0 %

3 %

1 %

0 %

12 %

Muscle tenderness intercostal 3/4 left

Tenderness

1 %

20 %

36 %

20 %

18 %

90 %

 

Pain

1 %

2 %

0 %

0 %

1 %

8 %

Muscle tenderness intercostal 4/5 left

Tenderness

3 %

46 %

12 %

10 %

5 %

91 %

 

Pain

1 %

15 %

0 %

1 %

1 %

6 %

Muscle tenderness intercostal 5/6 left

Tenderness

2 %

57 %

5 %

3 %

4 %

89 %

 

Pain

0 %

21 %

0 %

0 %

0 %

6 %

Muscle tenderness intercostal 6/7 left

Tenderness

1 %

42 %

1 %

1 %

0 %

82 %

 

Pain

0 %

14 %

0 %

1 %

1 %

8 %

Muscle tenderness pectoralis major right

Tenderness

0 %

16 %

75 %

74 %

28 %

56 %

 

Pain

0 %

0 %

21 %

16 %

4 %

24 %

Muscle tenderness pectoralis minor right

Tenderness

1 %

17 %

80 %

68 %

33 %

66 %

 

Pain

0 %

0 %

11 %

7 %

1 %

20 %

Muscle tenderness intercostal 2/3 right

Tenderness

0 %

9 %

59 %

38 %

16 %

90 %

 

Pain

0 %

1 %

0 %

1 %

1 %

8 %

Muscle tenderness intercostal 3/4 right

Tenderness

1 %

15 %

32 %

15 %

9 %

90 %

 

Pain

0 %

0 %

0 %

1 %

1 %

6 %

Muscle tenderness intercostal 4/5 right

Tenderness

0 %

27 %

10 %

4 %

4 %

90 %

 

Pain

0 %

2 %

0 %

0 %

0 %

4 %

Muscle tenderness intercostal 5/6 right

Tenderness

0 %

30 %

3 %

1 %

0 %

89 %

 

Pain

0 %

4 %

0 %

0 %

0 %

4 %

Muscle tenderness intercostal 6/7 right

Tenderness

0 %

17 %

2 %

2 %

0 %

84 %

 

Pain

0 %

5 %

0 %

0 %

0 %

4 %

Tenderness c4/5 paraspinal posterior

Yes

3 %

6 %

6 %

1 %

17 %

27 %

Tenderness c5/6 paraspinal posterior

Yes

4 %

13 %

11 %

3 %

20 %

26 %

Tenderness c6/7 paraspinal posterior

Yes

3 %

13 %

8 %

3 %

12 %

19 %

Tenderness c7/th1 paraspinal posterior

Yes

1 %

8 %

18 %

0 %

9 %

21 %

Tenderness th1/2 paraspinal posterior

Yes

2 %

14 %

50 %

0 %

20 %

31 %

Tenderness th2/3 paraspinal posterior

Yes

3 %

27 %

89 %

0 %

46 %

51 %

Tenderness th3/4 paraspinal posterior

Yes

1 %

33 %

78 %

0 %

54 %

61 %

Tenderness th4/5 paraspinal posterior

Yes

1 %

38 %

40 %

1 %

59 %

59 %

Tenderness th5/6 paraspinal posterior

Yes

1 %

45 %

13 %

0 %

53 %

41 %

Tenderness th6/7 paraspinal posterior

Yes

1 %

43 %

1 %

0 %

45 %

35 %

Tenderness th7/8 paraspinal posterior

Yes

3 %

27 %

2 %

0 %

26 %

33 %

Tenderness th8/9 paraspinal posterior

Yes

2 %

12 %

0 %

0 %

17 %

25 %

Posterior vertebral springing th1/2

Yes

0 %

8 %

10 %

2 %

4 %

2 %

Posterior vertebral springing th2/3

Yes

1 %

7 %

41 %

11 %

18 %

17 %

Posterior vertebral springing th3/4

Yes

0 %

21 %

51 %

11 %

21 %

26 %

Posterior vertebral springing th4/5

Yes

0 %

15 %

31 %

5 %

18 %

28 %

Posterior vertebral springing th5/6

Yes

0 %

14 %

12 %

0 %

24 %

17 %

Posterior vertebral springing th6/7

Yes

1 %

19 %

2 %

0 %

19 %

11 %

Posterior vertebral springing th7/8

Yes

2 %

12 %

1 %

2 %

14 %

11 %

Posterior vertebral springing th8/9

Yes

5 %

9 %

1 %

0 %

10 %

19 %