Table 3 Physical characteristics of the clinic
From: The chiropractic profession in Denmark 2010–2014: a descriptive report
Physical size of the clinic | 2010 (n = 143) | 2012 (n = 193) | 2014 (n = 201) |
Average size (m2) | 226 m2 | 216 m2 | 223 m2 |
<100 m2 | 10 % | 10 % | 12 % |
100–199 m2 | 39 % | 44 % | 37 % |
200–299 m2 | 22 % | 25 % | 23 % |
300–399 m2 | 10 % | 8 % | 12 % |
≥400 m2 | 10 % | 9 % | 10 % |
Missing | 9 % | 4 % | 5 % |
Number of treatment rooms | 2010 (n = 143) | 2012 (n = 193) | 2014 (n = 201) |
1–2 | 32 % | 37 % | 35 % |
3–5 | 43 % | 44 % | 48 % |
6–10 | 15 % | 15 % | 11 % |
>10 | 2 % | 1 % | 2 % |
Missing | 8 % | 4 % | 3 % |
Exercise facilities a | 2010 (n = 143) | 2012 (n = 193) | 2014 (n = 201) |
Separate exercise room at the clinic | 31 % | 22 % | 29 % |
Gym machines | 16 % | 15 % | 15 % |
Movable exercise equipment | 52 % | 47 % | 51 % |
Shower | 14 % | 9 % | 12 % |
No facilities | 39 % | 48 % | 41 % |
Missing | 8 % | 4 % | 4 % |
Average size of exercise rooms (m2) | 113 m2 | 122 m2 | 123 m2 |
Diagnostic imaging facilities a | 2010 (n = 143) | 2012 (n = 193) | 2014 (n = 201) |
Digital X-ray equipment | 57 % | 63 % | 70 % |
Analogue X-ray equiment | 25 % | 15 % | 5 % |
Ultrasound | 18 % | 19 % | 17 % |
MR imaging | 7 % | 1 % | 1 % |
None | 9 % | 13 % | 17 % |
Missing | 10 % | 5 % | 4 % |