Skip to main content

Table 3 Usage of modality-groups for treatment of typical patients with acute and chronic non specific neck-pain

From: Managing patients with acute and chronic non-specific neck pain: are Danish chiropractors compliant with guidelines?

 

Acute

Chronic

 

Used

Not used

Used

Not used

Treatment usage

Often

Occ.*

Rarely

Never

Refer

OSP**

Often

Occ*

Rarely

Never

Refer

OSP**

p-valuea

Manipulation

306 (93,9%)

13 (4%)

3 (0,9%)

3 (0,9%)

1 (0,3%)

0 (0%)

288 (91,1%)

21 (6,6%)

3 (0,9%)

3 (0,9%)

1 (0,3%)

0 (0%)

0,189

Other manual therapies

199 (64,8%)

72 (23,5%)

28 (9,1%)

6 (2%)

2 (0,7%)

0 (0%)

204 (66,7%)

76 (24,8%)

17 (5,6%)

8 (2,6%)

1 (0,3%)

0 (0%)

0,630

Other treatment modalities

101 (34,5%)

87 (29,7%)

79 (27%)

21 (7,2%)

5 (1,7%)

0 (0%)

138 (46%)

107 (35,7%)

48 (16%)

5 (1,7%)

2 (0,7%)

0 (0%)

0,004*

Exercise

56 (19,1%)

91 (31,1%)

109 (37,2%)

32 (10,9%)

3 (1%)

2 (0,7%)

196 (62,8%)

82 (26,3%)

24 (7,7%)

3 (1%)

4 (1,3%)

3 (1%)

<0,001*

Orthoses

1 (0,4%)

20 (7,1%)

79 (28,1%)

181 (64,4%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

13 (4,5%)

48 (16,7%)

90 (31,3%)

131 (45,5%)

4 (1,4%)

2 (0,7%)

0,001*

Information/patient education

302 (94,4%)

15 (4,7%)

2 (0,6%)

0 (0%)

1 (0,3%)

0 (0%)

309 (97,5%)

6 (1,9%)

0 (0%)

2 (0,6%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0,189

  1. *Occacionally, **OSP = Outside Scope of Practice
  2. aDifferences in usage of treatment-groups between acute and chronic patients, tested with chi-squared test, *significant at p < 0.05 level. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding