Skip to main content

Table 6 Summary of quality scores and quality classification for 12 articles included in a systematic review on spinal manipulation and pressure pain threshold

From: The regional effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in asymptomatic subjects: a systematic literature review

 

First Author, Year [ref]

Score

Quality scale

SHAM STUDIES

Yu, 2012 [15]; Ruiz Saez, 2007 [16]

8/9

High

Srbely, 2013[17]

7.5/9

High

Fernadez de la Penas, 2008 *[18]

7/9

Medium

Fernadez de la Penas, 2007 [19]; Hamilton [20]

6.5/9

Medium

Thomson, 2009 [13]

6/9

Medium

Fryer, 2004 [21]

5/9

Medium

COMPARISON STUDIES

Alonso Peres, 2016 [22]

8.5/9

High

Oliveira Campelo, 2010 [23]

8/9

High

Jordon, 2016 [24]

7.5/9

High

Hamilton, 2007 [20]; Fernandez de las Penas, 2008 [18]

7/9

High

Fernadez de la Penas, 2007 [19]

6.5/9

Medium

Thomson, 2009 [13]

6/9

Medium

Fryer, 2004 [21]

5/9

Medium

Bishop, 2011 [25]

3.5/9

Low

  1. Classification: Low: 0–4.5pts; Medium: 5–6.5pts; High: 7-9pts. *Some articles were listed twice in the table, as they used a sham procedure and compared a spinal manipulation to another intervention