Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations between patient characteristics and the Consultation Reassurance Questionnaire (n = 717)

From: Feasibility of the consultation-based reassurance questionnaire in Danish chiropractic practice

 

Data-gathering, β (95% CI)

Relationship-building, β (95% CI)

Generic reassurance, β (95% CI)

Cognitive reassurance, β (95% CI)

Age

  

*

 

 < 35 (ref)

    

 35–50

-0.09 (-0.77; 0.58)

-0.30 (-0.93; 0.33)

-0.13 (-1.01; 0.76)

-0.48 (-1.21; 0.24)

 > 50

0.10 (-0.57; 0.77)

-0.14 (-0.76; 0.49)

-1.17 (-2.05; -0.28)

-0.29 (-1.01; 0.43)

 Females vs. males

0.32 (-0.19; 0.83)

0.51 (0.03; 0.98)*

-0.27 (-0.95; 0.40)

0.13 (-0.41;0.68)

Education

  

*

 

 No qualification (ref)

    

 Education < 3 years

0.32 (-0.42; 1.07)

0.06 (-0.64; 0.76)

-0.29 (-1.27;0.70)

0.31 (-0.50; 1.11)

 Education ≥ 3 years

-0.31(-1.07; 0.46)

-0.35 (-1.07;0.36)

-1.26 (-2.27; -0.25)

-0.33(-0.15; 0.49)

Symptom duration

  

*

 

 < 1 month (ref)

    

 1–3 months

0.69 (-0.11; 1.48)

0.54 (-0.20; 1.28)

-0.06 (-1.10; 0.97)

0.39 (-0.46; 1.25)

 > 3 months

0.14 (-0.52; 0.80)

-0.22 (-0.84; 0.39)

-1.86 (-2.72; -1.0)

-0.06 (-0.77; 0.65)

Previous chiropractic care (yes vs. no)

-0.46 (-1.00; 0.05)

-0.60 (-1.07; -0.13)*

-1.19 (-1.85; -0.53)*

-0.56 (-1.01; -0.02)*

  1. CI Confidence interval
  2. * Statistically significant association (p < 0.05) between the baseline factor and the CRQ sub-scale