Skip to main content

Table 1 Age, sex and spinal pain characteristics for the four cohorts. Where nothing else is noted, results are reported as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI)

From: Are frequent measurements in back pain research harmful? Two comparisons of back pain in groups with or without frequent follow-up

 

Cohort 1 (no SMS)

n = 1291

Cohort 1b (SMS)

n = 215

 

Cohort 2a (no SMS)

n = 36

Cohort 2b (SMS)

n = 161

5th grade

6th grade

50%

50%

40%

60%

Age at baseline mean (95%CI)

48

(45–52)

47

(45–48)

Male

52%

(49–54%)

43%

(36–50%)

Male

47%

(30–65%)

41%

(33–49%)

NPa

36%

(33-39%)

36%

(29–42%)

   

MBPa

24%

(21-26%)

28%

(22–34%)

Bothersomeness past 2 weeksc

Median (IQR)

3 (2–4)

2 (2–3)

LBPa

16%

(14-18%)

24%

(18–30%)

> 30 days of LBP previous year

72%

(54–86%)

62%

(54–70%)

SP

46%

(44–49%)

50%

(43–56%)

RMDQd

mean (95% CI)

39

(29–49)

29

(24–33)

Pain intensityb

mean (95% CI)

4.74

(4.46–5.02)

3.89

(3.52–4.27)

VAS past week

mean (95% CI)

4.61

(3.43–5.79)

3.23

(2.81–3.65)

  1. a‘often or some times’
  2. bFPS-r converted to a 0 to 10 scale for the spinal region with the highest reported pain intensity (only for those with a report of pain)
  3. cfive-point Likert scale
  4. dProportional score on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire