Skip to main content

Table 6 Full results of senstivity analyses

From: Manipulation-induced hypoalgesia in musculoskeletal pain populations: a systematic critical review and meta-analysis

Meta-analysis Correlation for variance calculationsa Mean kg/cm2 Hedge’s g Standard error 95% confidence interval p-value I2 Sample size
Change over time after SMT (all areas) 0.75
0.25
0.320
0.320
0.238
0.248
0.051
0.049
0.220–0.421
0.224–0.416
.000
.000
82.5%
85.5%
693
 Local subgroup 0.75
0.25
0.259
0.259
0.169
0.169
0.078
0.078
0.106–0.412
0.106–0.412
.001
.001
81.7%
81.7%
383
 Regional subgroup 0.75
0.25
0.349
0.348
0.178
0.184
0.085
0.082
0.181–0.516
0.187–0.509
.000
.000
79.8%
80.1%
533
 Remote subgroup 0.75
0.25
0.374
0.372
0.216
0.231
0.073
0.068
0.230–0.517
0.238–0.506
.000
.000
84.1%
86.0%
561
SMT vs. Sham difference 0.75
0.25
0.412
0.398
0.166
0.169
0.256
0.243
−0.090 - 0.913
−0.079 - 0.875
.108
.102
70.1%
70.3%
92
  1. aThis is the assumed correlation used in calculations for combined variances in studies with multiple testing sites. See Methods for explanation