Skip to main content

Table 2 O12 - number of items identified in initial and follow-up encounters of OEI students

From: Shared decision making by United Kingdom osteopathic students: an observational study using the OPTION-12 instrument

OPTIONS items

Initial encounters

(n = 7)

Follow-up encounter

(n = 23)

1: The clinician draws attention to an identified problem as one that requires a decision making process

0

2

2: The clinician states that there is more than one way to deal with the identified problem

0

1

3: The clinician assesses patient’s preferred approach to receiving information to assist decision making

0

0

4: The clinician lists ‘options’, which can include the choice of ‘no action’

0

0

5: The clinician explains the pros and cons of options to the patient (taking no action is an option)

1

1

6: The clinician explores the patient’s expectations (or ideas) about how the problem(s) are to be managed

0

3

7: The clinician explores the patient’s concerns (fears) about how problem(s) are to be managed

0

0

8: The clinician checks that the patient has understood the information

1

0

9: The clinician offers the patient explicit opportunities to ask questions during decision making process

0

0

10: The clinician elicits the patient’s preferred level of involvement in decision making

0

0

11: The clinician indicates the need for a decision making (or deferring) stage

0

0

12: The clinician indicates the need to review the decision

0

0

Total number of OPTION-12 items observed (number of OEI students)

2 (n = 2)

7 (n = 3)