Advertisement
Table 2 Quality of reporting of included studies on PGP
| Reporting Quality Question (PGP studies; n = 33) | Yes (%) | No (%) | N/A (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q.1. Is the primary outcome clearly stated? | 33 (100%) | 0 | 0 |
| Q.2. Is the primary outcome clearly defined so that another researcher would be able to reproduce its measurement? | 32 (97%) | 1 (3.0%) | 0 |
| Q.3. Are the secondary outcome clearly stated? | 11 (33.3%) | 1 (3.0%) | 21 (63.6%) |
| Q.4. Are the secondary outcomes clearly defined? | 11 (33.3%) | 1 (3.0%) | 21 (63.6%) |
| Q.5. Do the authors explain the use of the outcomes they have selected? | 23 (69.7%) | 10 (30.3%) | 0 |
| Q.6. Are methods used to enhance the quality of outcome measurement (e.g. repeated measurement, training), if appropriate? | 27 (81.8%) | 3 (9.1%) | 3 (9.1%) |
