Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Quality of reporting of included studies on PGP

From: Outcomes and outcomes measurements used in intervention studies of pelvic girdle pain and lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review

Reporting Quality Question (PGP studies; n = 33) Yes (%) No (%) N/A (%)
Q.1. Is the primary outcome clearly stated? 33 (100%) 0 0
Q.2. Is the primary outcome clearly defined so that another researcher would be able to reproduce its measurement? 32 (97%) 1 (3.0%) 0
Q.3. Are the secondary outcome clearly stated? 11 (33.3%) 1 (3.0%) 21 (63.6%)
Q.4. Are the secondary outcomes clearly defined? 11 (33.3%) 1 (3.0%) 21 (63.6%)
Q.5. Do the authors explain the use of the outcomes they have selected? 23 (69.7%) 10 (30.3%) 0
Q.6. Are methods used to enhance the quality of outcome measurement (e.g. repeated measurement, training), if appropriate? 27 (81.8%) 3 (9.1%) 3 (9.1%)