|
Q.1. Is the primary outcome clearly stated?
|
69 (93%)
|
3 (4%)
|
2 (2.7%)
|
|
Q.2. Is the primary outcome clearly defined so that another researcher would be able to reproduce its measurement?
|
62 (84%)
|
7 (9.5%)
|
5 (6.8%)
|
|
Q.3. Are the secondary outcome clearly stated?
|
25 (34%)
|
3 (4%)
|
46 (62%)
|
|
Q.4. Are the secondary outcomes clearly defined?
|
23 (31%
|
3 (4%)
|
48 (65%)
|
|
Q.5. Do the authors explain the use of the outcomes they have selected?
|
63 (85%)
|
10 (13.5%)
|
1 (1.4%)
|
|
Q.6. Are methods used to enhance the quality of outcome measurement (e.g. repeated measurement, training), if appropriate?
|
44 (59.5%)
|
7 (9.5%)
|
23 (31%)
|
