Skip to main content

Table 5 Information sources used by respondents to inform their clinical decision-making (n = 56)

From: Skills, attitudes and uptake of evidence-based practice: a cross-sectional study of chiropractors in the Swedish Chiropractic Association

Information source

Never used n (%)

Used a little n (%)

Used to a moderate extent n (%)

Used a lot n (%)

Always used n (%)

Missing n (%)

Median (IQR)

Published clinical evidence

0 (0.0)

6 (10.7)

21 (37.5)

22 (39.3)

5 (8.9)

2 (3.6)

4 (3,4)

Traditional knowledge

0 (0.0)

5 (8.9)

23 (41.1)

16 (28.6)

11 (19.6)

1 (1.8)

3 (3,4)

Clinical practice guidelines

3 (5.4)

8 (14.3)

17 (30.4)

21 (37.5)

6 (10.7)

1 (1.8)

3 (3,4)

Personal preference

2 (3.6)

10 (17.9)

21 (37.5)

20 (35.7)

3 (5.4)

0 (0.0)

3 (3,4)

Patient preference

1 (1.8)

13 (23.2)

17 (30.4)

19 (33.9)

5 (8.9)

1 (1.8)

3 (2,4)

Personal intuition

7 (12.5)

10 (17.9)

18 (32.1)

18 (32.1)

3 (5.4)

0 (0.0)

3 (2,4)

Fellow practitioners or experts

2 (3.6)

14 (25.0)

24 (42.9)

15 (26.8)

1 (1.8)

0 (0.0)

3 (2,4)

Textbooks

5 (8.9)

11 (19.6)

27 (48.2)

11 (19.6)

2 (3.6)

0 (0.0)

3 (2,3)

Trial and error

2 (3.6)

30 (53.6)

19 (33.9)

5 (8.9)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (2,3)

Experimental/laboratory evidence

28 (50.0)

14 (25.0)

8 (14.3)

3 (5.4)

0 (0.0)

3 (5.4)

1 (1,2)

  1. IQR Interquartile range; main response in bold