Skip to main content

Table 2 Adjusted differences in pressure pain threshold (PPT) readings in kPa at regional testing site at four different times after the interventions

From: What is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in young, asymptomatic subjects? A randomized placebo-controlled trial, with a cross-over design

Time measurements

SPINAL MANIPULATION

SHAM procedure

Differences between groups (95% CI)

P value

Means (SD)

Min-Max

Values

95% CI

Means (SD)

Min-Max

values

95% CI

Baseline

406 (158)

118–873

361–451

416 (162)

143–877

370–462

−10 (−73;53)

0.76

PPT 1

446 (169)

125–1048

395–487

447 (154)

173–768

389–482

−1 (−64;63)

0.98

PPT 2

450 (168)

137–903

401–494

438 (159)

145–807

386–478

12(−53;77)

0.72

PPT 3

443 (158)

125–853

394–487

438 (180)

151–962

387–480

4(−50;58)

0.90

PPT 4

444 (161)

146–823

395–487

432 (167)

136–859

378–470

12(−51;75)

0.71

  1. SD standard deviation, SE standard error, PPT pressure pain threshold, PPT 1 follow-up time 1 immediately after intervention, PPT2 follow-up time 2 at T + 12 min after intervention, PPT 3 follow-up time 3 at T + 24 min after intervention, PPT 4 follow-up time 4 at T + 36 min after intervention