Skip to main content

Table 3 Adjusted differences in pressure pain threshold (PPT) readings in kPa at remote testing site at four different times after the interventions

From: What is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold in young, asymptomatic subjects? A randomized placebo-controlled trial, with a cross-over design

Time measurements

SPINAL MANIPULATION

SHAM procedure

Differences between groups (95% CI)

P value

Means (SD)

Min-Max values

95% CI

Means (SD)

Min-Max values

95% CI

Baseline

511 (166)

221–894

462–568

479 (154)

187–831

432–525

32(− 33;97)

0.34

PPT 1

564 (192)

248–1027

517–623

536 (172)

203–916

485–588

27(− 12;66)

0.47

PPT 2

576 (199)

205–1128

529–635

523 (176)

190–950

471–576

53(− 10;96)

0.18

PPT 3

579 (204)

190–1097

533–639

533 (177)

170–910

486–581

38(−48;124)

0.23

PPT 4

573 (203)

207–1195

527–633

524 (160)

197–817

480–570

49(− 53;151)

0.19

  1. SD standard deviation, SE standard error, PPT pressure pain threshold, PPT 1 follow-up time 1 immediately after intervention, PPT2 follow-up time 2 at T + 12 min after intervention, PPT 3 follow-up time 3 at T + 24 min after intervention, PPT 4 follow-up time 4 at T + 36 min after intervention