Skip to main content

Table 7 Risk of Bias table: Cohort Studies

From: The safety of spinal manipulative therapy in children under 10 years: a rapid review

Risk of Bias table: Low risk of bias - Cohort Studies

Author, Year

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

1.10

1.11

1.12

1.13

1.14

Overall Assessment

Saedt, 2018 [33]

Y

N/A

Y

N/A

CS

N/A

Y

N/A

CS

CS

N

N/A

N/A

N

+

Risk of Bias table: High risk of bias - Cohort Studies

Author, Year

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

1.10

1.11

1.12

1.13

1.14

Overall Assessment

Douglas, 2016 [74]

Y

N/A

N

N/A

0%

N/A

CS

N/A

N

CS

N

N/A

N/A

Y

–

  1. Y yes, N no, N/A not applicable, CS can’t say; ++: high quality; +: acceptable quality; −: unacceptable quality/rejected
  2. Legend: Cohort Studies
  3. 1.1 Research Question
  4. 1.2 Comparable Sources
  5. 1.3 % Participation
  6. 1.4 Outcome Analysis
  7. 1.5 % Drop-out
  8. 1.6 Compare Loss to Follow-Up
  9. 1.7 Outcome Defined
  10. 1.8 Blinding
  11. 1.9 Acknowledge Bias
  12. 1.10 Reliability of Exposure
  13. 1.11 Other Sources for Reliability
  14. 1.12 Measurements Occur > 1 time
  15. 1.13 Confounders
  16. 1.14 Confidence Intervals
Back to article page

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies

ISSN: 2045-709X