Skip to main content

Table 1 Prevalence of classification for two, six and eight subcategories for each of the five raters

From: Categorisation of lumbar spine MRI referrals in Denmark as compliant or non-compliant to international imaging guidelines: an inter-rater reliability study

 

Rater 1

Rater 2

Rater 3

Rater 4

Rater 5

Two categories:

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

 Inappropriate referrals for MRI

41 (82)

40 (80)

39 (78)

40 (80)

42 (84)

 Appropriate referrals for MRI

9 (18)

10 (20)

11 (22)

10 (20)

8 (16)

Six subcategories

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Inappropriate referrals for MRI

 1 No information on previous treatment and duration

41 (82)

40 (80)

39 (78)

40 (80)

42 (84)

Appropriate referrals for MRI

 2 Fracture

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 3 Cancer, infection, immunosuppression or spondylarthritis

5 (10)

5 (10)

6 (12)

5 (10)

4 (8)

 4 Persistent/progressive symptoms after six weeks of treatment

0 (0)

2 (4)

1 (2)

1 (2)

0 (0)

 5 Prior lumbar surgery and new or progressing symptoms

4 (8)

3 (6)

4 (8)

4 (8)

4 (8)

 6 Cauda equina syndrome / progressive neurologic deficit

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Eight subcategories:

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Inappropriate referrals for MRI

 1 No information on previous treatment

23 (46)

24 (48)

20 (40)

25 (50)

26 (52)

 2 No information on duration of previous treatment

18 (36)

16 (32)

19 (38)

15 (30)

16 (32)

 3 Other reasons

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Appropriate referrals for MRI

 4 Fracture

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 5 Cancer, infection, immunosuppression or spondylarthritis

5 (10)

5 (10)

6 (12)

5 (10)

4 (8)

 6 Persistent/progressive symptoms after six weeks of treatment

0 (0)

2 (4)

1 (2)

1 (2)

0 (0)

 7 Prior lumbar surgery and new or progressing symptoms

4 (8)

3 (6)

4 (8)

4 (8)

4 (8)

 8 Cauda equina syndrome / progressive neurologic deficit

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)