Skip to main content

Table 2 Diagnostic accuracy in development dataset 1 using each level of the MAINTAIN instrument as possible discrimination thresholds to classify dysfunctional patients (96 individuals were classified as dysfunctional by the original instrument in this sample)

From: Development and evaluation of the MAINTAIN instrument, selecting patients suitable for secondary or tertiary preventive manual care: the Nordic maintenance care program

Development dataset 1 (n = 249)

MS

n (DYS)

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

PPV (%)

NPV (%)

Youden’s index

8

229

100.0

13.0

41.5

100.0

0.110

9

224

100.0

16.2

42.4

100.0

0.130

10

220

100.0

18.8

43.2

100.0

0.162

11

218

100.0

20.1

43.6

100.0

0.188

12

205

100.0

28.6

46.3

100.0

0.201

13

201

100.0

31.2

47.3

100.0

0.286

14

193

100.0

36.4

49.2

100.0

0.312

15

180

98.9

44.2

52.2

98.6

0.364

16

173

98.9

48.7

54.3

98.7

0.431

17

159

96.8

56.5

57.9

96.7

0.476

18

146

95.8

64.3

62.3

96.1

0.533

19

140

94.7

67.5

64.3

95.4

0.601

20

133

90.5

69.5

64.7

92.2

0.623

21

122

86.3

74.0

67.2

89.8

0.600

22

109

81.1

79.2

70.6

87.1

0.603

23

103

75.8

79.9

69.9

84.2

0.603

24

92

70.5

83.8

72.8

82.2

0.557

25

84

63.2

84.4

71.4

78.8

0.543

26

74

60.0

89.0

77.0

78.3

0.476

27

67

55.8

90.9

79.1

76.9

0.490

  1. MS, MAINTAIN Score (emphasis represent recommended thresholds); n(DYS), number of individuals classified as dysfunctional by the MAINTAIN instrument at that threshold; PPV, Positive Predictive Value; NPV, Negative Predictive Value