Table 1 Clinician characteristics and outcomes (N = 20)
From: GLA:D® Back Australia: a mixed methods feasibility study for implementation
N (%) (unless other specified) | |
|---|---|
Age, mean (range) | 36 (23–52) |
Female | 7 (35%) |
Physiotherapist | 12 (60%) |
Chiropractor | 8 (40%) |
All clinicians | |
Clinic owner | 5 (25%) |
Self-employed | 6 (30%) |
Employee | 6 (30%) |
Other (i.e., contractor) | 3 (15%) |
Private clinic | 16 (80%) |
Hospital department | 4 (20%) |
Clinical experience | |
0–5 years | 6 (30%) |
6–10 years | 2 (10%) |
11–20 years | 7 (35%) |
> 20 years | 5 (25%) |
Previous experience with GLA:D® hip and knee | |
No experience | 9 (45%) |
Have referred to GLA:D in house (within the clinic) | 1 (5%) |
Have referred to GLA:D in another clinic | 0 (0%) |
Have instructed GLA:D groups | 9 (45%) |
Other | 1 (5%) |
Training evaluation, immediately after the GLA:D® Back course—median (range) | |
Content (0–10) range | 9 (8–10) |
Usability (0–10) range | 9 (8.5–10) |
Novelty (0–10) range | 8 (8–9) |
Overall satisfaction with the GLA:D® Back program | 10 missing |
Very satisfied | 7 (70%) |
Satisfied | 3 (30%) |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 0 (0%) |
Dissatisfied | 0 (0%) |
Very dissatisfied | 0 (0%) |
Satisfaction with patient education materials | 10 missing |
Very satisfied | 4 (40%) |
Satisfied | 5 (50%) |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 0 (0%) |
Dissatisfied | 1 (10%) |
Very dissatisfied | 0 (0%) |