Skip to main content

Table 3 Ordinal logistic regression model results for the question ‘SM is safe and effective for patients with XXX complaints’

From: Knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes of spinal manipulation: a cross-sectional survey of Italian physiotherapists

 

Upper cervical OR (95% CI)

Mid/lower cervical OR (95% CI)

Thoracic OR (95% CI)

Lumbar OR (95% CI)

Sex

Male

2.11 (1.44–3.09)

2.03(1.37–3.01)

1.22 (0.81–1.84)

1.48 (0.98–2.24)

Female

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

CPR aware

Yes

1.75 (1.18–2.61)

1.96 (1.31–2.95)

2.12 (1.39–3.22)

3.12 (2.07–4.74)

No

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

Years of practice

0–5

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

6–10

1.92 (1.31–2.82)

2.15 (1.48-.3.21)

2.01 (1.33–3.02)

1.71 (1.14–2.57)

Musculoskeletal specialization

Yes

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

No

1.79 (1.25–2.58)

1.26 (0.86–1.86)

0.96 (0.65–1.44)

0.85 (0.57–1.26)

Access regimen

Direct access

1.76 (1.22–2.54)

1.51 (1.02–2.21)

1.37 (0.92–2.05)

1.12 (0.75–1.66)

Secondary care referral pathway

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

  1. Bold OR’s indicate significant results; CPR = clinical prediction rule; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval