Skip to main content

Table 1 Proprioceptive error calculated as the difference between the average initial reference position and the position on retargeting after the conditioning sequence.

From: Head repositioning errors in normal student volunteers: a possible tool to assess the neck's neuromuscular system

TEST

Cardinal Plane (Motion)

n

Mean proprioceptive error by conditioning sequence. In degrees ± SD

Statistic (p)

   

No Hold

Passive Hold

Active Hold

 

EXTENSION

Sagittal Plane (AP-Flexion)

48

0.72 ± 2.61

0.75 ± 3.28

-1.40* ± 3.29

F2,94 = 8.85 (<0.001)

 

Frontal Plane (Lateral Bending)

45

0.05 ± 1.21

-0.20 ± 1.49

-0.01 ± 1.73

F2,88 = 0.54 (0.59)

 

Horizontal Plane (Rotation)

48

0.12 ± 1.57

-0.10 ± 1.26

-0.05 ± 2.09

F2,94 = 0.40 (0.67)

LATERAL FLEXION

Sagittal Plane (AP-Flexion)

48

0.31 ± 2.44

0.93 ± 2.94

2.02 ± 3.30

F2,94 = 6.70 (0.002)

 

Frontal Plane (Lateral Bending)

45

0.09 ± 1.76

-0.07 ± 2.45

0.79 ± 2.37

F2,88 = 2.27 (0.11)

 

Horizontal Plane (Rotation)

48

1.01 ± 1.50

1.18 ± 1.92

1.17 ± 2.26

F2,94 = 0.15 (0.86)

  1. * Significantly different from 2 other conditioning sequences in post-hoc analysis (p < 0.002)
  2. Significantly different from No Hold conditioning sequence in post-hoc analysis (p < 0.002)