Table 3 PosturePrint^® reliability analysis with a conservative ICC method (ICC_2,1). Three examiners evaluated forty student volunteers, with a posture digitizer, twice over 2 days.

3.2°

4.5

2.4°

0.56

0.44–0.68

0.72

0.59 – 0.82

3.3° ± 2.6

-3.1°

3.1

1.5°

0.65

0.53–0.76

0.76

0.64 – 0.86

2.3° ± 1.7

-1.2°

5.7

2.7°

0.69

0.58–0.79

0.77

0.66 – 0.86

3.5° ± 2.7

-0.3°

1.1

0.9°

N/A¶

N/A

N/A

N/A

0.6° ± 1.2

0.2°

1.3

1.2°

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1.0° ± 1.4

-0.1°

1.8

1.2°

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1.6° ± 1.3

-0.3°

1.5

1.3°

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1.5° ± 1.3

0.3°

1.4

0.7°

0.66

0.55–0.77

0.76

0.66–0.85

1.0° ± 0.8

1.1°

2.3

1.2°

0.66

0.55–0.77

0.75

0.64–0.84

1.9° ± 1.3

-3.6 mm

7.1

4.3 mm

0.51

0.39 – 0.64

0.64

0.51 – 0.76

6.0 mm ± 4.3

2.0 mm

6.5

2.6 mm

0.72

0.62 – 0.82

0.84

0.74 – 0.90

4.2 mm ± 3.2

-0.6 mm

6.0

3.4 mm

0.54

0.42 – 0.67

0.67

0.54 – 0.78

5.2 mm ± 3.9

54.4 mm

17.0

5.9 mm

0.80

0.71 – 0.87

0.88

0.81 – 0.93

8.4 mm ± 6.3

3.6 mm

9.8

5.5 mm

0.54

0.41 – 0.68

0.68

0.52 – 0.81

8.3 mm ± 6.0

30.1 mm

9.1

4.6 mm

0.64

0.52 – 0.75

0.75

0.64 – 0.84

6.0 mm ± 4.6