Table 3 Intention to treat analysis comparing TENS and de-tuned TENS while Walking*
Outcome | Baseline | Active TENS | De-tuned TENS | Treatment effect | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean difference from baseline with 95% CI | Adjusted Treatment effect with 95% CI | P value | |||
Primary Outcomes | |||||
No. of Participants | 104 | 49 | 51 | ||
SPWT Distance meters | 210.1 (70.0 to 350.2) | 163.3 (72.5 to 254.1) | 46.9 (−118.4 to 212.1) | 0.57 | |
Percentage with 95% CI | Relative Risk with 95% CI | ||||
> 30% improvement in SPWT - % [N] | 71 (57, 82) [35/49] | 74 (60, 84) [38/51] | 0.96 (0.7 to 1.2) | 0.77 | |
Secondary Outcome | |||||
> 50% improvement in SPWT- % [N] | 69 (55, 80) [34/49] | 69 (56, 80) [35/51] | 0.99 (0.8 to 1.3) | 0.94 | |