Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk of bias table based on Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) Criteria for high risk of bias studies; randomized controlled trials

From: The effects of spinal manipulation on performance-related outcomes in healthy asymptomatic adult population: a systematic review of best evidence

Author, Year

Research Question

Randomization

Concealment

Blinding

Similarity at baseline

Similarity between arms

Outcome measures

Percent drop-out

Intention to treat

Results between sites

Level of evidence

Botelho et al., 2012

Y

Y

CS

N

N

N

Y

0%

NA

NA

1-

Cardinale et al., 2015

Y

Y

N

CS

Y

Y

CS

0%

NA

NA

1-

Enebo et al., 2003

Y

Y

CS

N

CS

CS

CS

0%

CS

NA

1-

Engel et al. 2007

Y

Y

Y

CS

N

N

CS

20%

N

NA

1-

Fox et al., 2006

Y

Y

CS

N

Y

Y

CS

CS

CS

NA

1-

Miller et al., 2000

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

CS

CS

Y

NA

1-

Nansel et al., 1992

Y

Y

CS

N

CS

CS

Y

0%

Y

NA

1-

Nansel et al., 1993

Y

Y

CS

Y

CS

Y

CS

0%

Y

NA

1-

Palmgren et al., 2009

Y

Y

Y

N

CS

Y

Y

0%

Y

NA

1-

Passmore et al., 2010

Y

Y

CS

Y

CS

CS

Y

0%

Y

NA

1-

Pollard et al., 1998

Y

Y

CS

CS

CS

CS

CS

CS

CS

NA

1-

Schwartzbauer et al., 1997

CS

Y

N

N

CS

CS

CS

25%

Y

NA

1-

Shrier et al., 2006

Y

Y

CS

CS

Y

Y

Y

17.6%

Y

NA

1-

Stamos-Papastamos et al., 2011

Y

Y

CS

N

Y

Y

Y

CS

Y

NA

1-

Straub et al., 2001

Y

Y

CS

CS

CS

CS

Y

0%

Y

NA

1-

Ward et al., 2012

N

Y

N

N

CS

CS

CS

5%

NA

NA

1-

Ward et al., 2013

Y

Y

Y

N

N

N

Y

0%

CS

NA

1-

Ward et al., 2014

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y

N

0%

Y

NA

1-

  1. Y Yes, N No, CS Can’t say, NA Not applicable