Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Reliability and validity of physical examination tests for the assessment of ankle instability

Study

Purpose

Sample size

Study population

Examiner/s

Test/s

Reference standard

Statistic

Alonso et al. [43]

Interrater reliability

53

Patients with ankle injuries presenting to private physiotherapy clinics

Time since injury: mean 34.2 ± 125 days

(range 0–889). Mix acute/chronic

38 males (71.7%), 15 females (28.3%)

Age: mean 24.3 ± 8.5 yrs. (range 12–52)

9 physiotherapists 1–11 yr. experience (mean 5 yrs.)

2 tested each participant

Squeeze test

External rotation test

The palpation test

Dorsiflexion compression test

NA

Kappa, percent agreement

Croy et al. [44]

Validity

66

Individuals with a history of lateral ankle sprains. Time since injury: mean 23.1 ± 30.8 months (range 0.03, 108). Mix acute/chronic

35 males (53%), 31 females (47%)

Age: mean 22.7 ± 3.6 yrs

Physical therapist 13 yr. experience

Anterior drawer test

Ultrasound

Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios

de César et al. [45]

Validity

56

Patients with ankle sprains

Time since injury: mean 6.6 ± 2.3 days

Age: mean 32 ± 13 yrs. (range 18–66)

Lead investigator on study

Ankle external rotation test

Squeeze test

MRI

Sensitivity, specificity

De Simoni et al. [49]

Validity

30

Patients with ankle sprains

Time since injury: mean 3 days (range 0–19)

15 males (50%), 15 females (50%)

Age: mean 33 yrs. (range 19–65)

 

Click test*

Suction sign*

Tenderness on palpation:

Anterior talo-fibular ligament

Calcaneo-fibular ligament

MRI

chi-squared test

George et al. [48]

Validity

35

Patients with a history of lateral ankle sprains

Time since injury: mean 3.6 ± 3.32 weeks (between 5 days and 12 weeks)

17 males (48.6%), 18 females (51.4%)

Age: mean 21.97 ± 7.1 yrs. (range 12–39)

1 sport medicine physician, 1 experienced musculoskeletal consultant radiologist

Anterior drawer test

Talar tilt test

Ultrasound

Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, p value

Gomes et al. [16]

Validity

24

10 asymptomatic

14 complaints of ankle instability. Time since injury: mean 18.3 months (range 5–48)

9 males (64.3%), 5 females (35.7%)

Age: mean 28 yrs. (range 23–42)

2 resident physicians trained by senior orthopaedic surgeon

Anterolateral talar palpation

Anterior drawer test

MRI (only for cases)

Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy

Großterlinden et al. [50]

Interrater reliability and validity

96

Patients with acute ankle sprains

55 males (57%), 41 females (43%)

Age: mean 32.6 ± 10.2 yrs. (range 18–59)

2 examiners:

1 senior, 1 resident

Tenderness on palpation:

Anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament

Proximal fibula

Deltoid ligament

Anterior talo-fibular ligament

Calcaneo-fibular ligament

Syndesmosis Squeeze test

External rotation test

Drawer test

Cotton test

Crossed-leg test

MRI

Weighted Kappa, percent agreement, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values

Hosseinian et al. [53]

Interrater reliability and validity

105

Patients with ankle injuries presenting to a hospital. 47 male (55.2%), 58 female (55.2%). Age: mean 32.95 ± 1.55 yrs. (range 16–60)

2 examiners:

1 senior orthopedic resident

1 orthopedic specialist

Anterior drawer test

Inversion stress test

Eversion stress test

Squeeze test

External rotation stress test

MRI

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, Kappa, p value

Li et al. [52]

Interrater reliability and validity

36

36 patients (72 ankles) with suspected anterior talofibular ligament injury

38 ankles (from 31 participants) injured group, 34 ankles (from 29 participants) control group

Injured group: 18 males (58%), 13 females (42%). Age: mean 30.4 ± 8.9 yrs

Control group: 15 males (52%), 14 females (48%) Age: mean 30.4 ± 8.9 yrs

2 examiners:

1 junior examiner

1 senior examiner

Anterior drawer test

Anterolateral drawer test

Reverse anterolateral drawer test

Ultrasound

Sensitivity, specificity, false negative rate, false positive rate, accuracy, Kappa, p value

Parasher et al. [17]

Intrarater/ interrater reliability

20

12 with ankle sprains, 8 without ankle sprains

Measured bilaterally: 40 ankles

(total: 16 ankle sprains, 24 injury free)

5 males (25%), 15 females (75%)

Age: range 20–30 yrs

2 testers

Anterior drawer: goniometer

Distal fibular position: digital vernier caliper

NA

Intra-class correlation coefficient

Phisitkul et al. [46]

Validity

10

Cadaveric: below the knee specimens

(4 pairs, 2 single) 2 intact ligaments, 5 cut anterior talofibular ligament, 3 cut anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligament

4 males (6 ankles), 2 females (4 ankles)

Age: mean 50 yrs

2 examiners:

1 Ankle surgeon (anteriolateral draw test)

1 In-training fellow (anterior drawer test)

Anterolateral drawer test

Anterior drawer test

Cut ligaments. Direct anatomical measurement

ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity

Rosen et al. [18]

Validity

88

39 chronic ankle instability, 17 ankle sprain copers, 32 healthy controls

43 males (48.9%), 45 females (51.1%)

Age: range 18–35 yrs

1 rater

Talar test: manual and Ligmaster

History: ankle injuries & Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool

Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio

Sman et al. [47]

Validity

87

Acute ankle sprains. 38 ankle syndesmosis injury, 42 Lateral sprain, 4 midfoot sprain, 1 medial ankle sprain, 2 pain no sprain

Time since injury: mean 2.5 ± 3.8 days

78% male

Age: mean 24.6 ± 6.5 yrs

13 clinicians: sports clubs, sports medicine, physiotherapy practices. 1–35 yrs. experience (mean 12 yrs.)

Dorsiflexion-external rotation test

Dorsiflexion lunge with compression

Squeeze test

Syndesmosis ligament palpation

MRI

Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, accuracy, odds ratios

Van Dijk et al. [54]

Interrater reliability and validity

160

Patients with acute injury (within 48 h) to the lateral ligaments

116 males (72.5%, 44 females (27.5%)

Age: mean 27.3 years (range 18–40 years)

5 examiners

1 experienced orthopaedic surgeon, 4 inexperienced doctors

Anterior drawer test

Tenderness on palpation:

Anterior talo-fibular Ligament

Calcaneo-fibular Ligament

Syndesmosis

Medial

Talocrural joint

Peroneal tendon

Lateral malleolus

Diffusely lateral

Supination line

Arthrography

Kappa, sensitivity, specificity

Vaseenon et al. [51]

Intrarater/ interrater reliability and validity

9

Cadaveric: human ankle specimens (4 pairs, 1 single) 3 intact ligaments, 3 cut anterior talofibular ligament, 3 cut anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligament

2 males, 3 females

Age: mean 55 yrs. (range 48–70)

8 testers:

4 athletic training students (mean experience: 2.25 yrs.), 4 senior orthopaedic trainees (mean experience 4.5 yrs.)

Anterolateral drawer test

Anterior drawer test

Cut ligaments. Direct anatomical measurement

Intra-class correlation coefficient, ROC, sensitivity, specificity,

Wilkin et al. [19]

Interrater reliability

60

38 sprainers, 22 non-sprainers, 3 additional ankle injuries

9 males (15%), 51 female (85%)

Age: range 17–50 yrs

5 raters: 4 experienced physiotherapists, 1 undergraduate student (compared 2 experienced & student)

Anterior drawer in supine

Anterior drawer in Crook lying

Talar tilt

Inversion tilt

NA

Intra-class correlation coefficient

  1. NA, Not applicable; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; ROC curve, Receiver operating characteristics curve
  2. *Not enough results in study to calculate the required statistics for results tables