Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics

From: Multimorbidity in patients with low back pain in Danish chiropractic practice: a cohort study

 

Total

Missing

LBPf Intensity < 7a

LBP Intensity ≥ 7a

p-valuee

(n = 2083)

(n = 1217)

(n = 825)

Sex, n (%)

 

0

   

 Male

1165 (55.9)

 

719 (62.9)

424 (37.1)

0.0006

 Female

918 (44.1)

 

498 (55.4)

401 (44.6)

 

Age, mean (sd)

46.07 (13.50)

0

44.74 (13.61)

46.16 (13.28)

0.4852

BMI, n (%)

 

11

  

0.0122

 ≤ 25 kg/m2

853 (41.2)

 

521 (61.9)

321 (38.1)

 

 26–29 kg/m2

776 (37.5)

 

460 (60.9)

296 (39.2)

 

 ≥ 30 kg/m2

443 (21.4)

 

232 (53.6)

201 (46.4)

 

Smoker, n (%)

 

4

  

0.0036

 Yes

336 (16.2)

 

171 (51.4)

162 (48.7)

 

 No, I have stopped smoking

711 (34.2)

 

427 (61.8)

264 (38.2)

 

 No, I have never smoked

1031 (49.6)

 

615 (60.7)

399 (39.4)

 

Education n (%)

 

61

  

0.0878

 None

313 (15.5)

 

179 (58.7)

126 (41.3)

 

 Vocational or short education

848 (42.0)

 

481 (57.7)

353 (42.3)

 

 Middle further education

553 (27.4)

 

320 (58.9)

223 (41.1)

 

 University degree

233 (11.5)

 

152 (66.7)

76 (33.3)

 

 Other

74 (3.7)

 

48 (67.6)

23 (32.4)

 

Working, n (%)

 

32

  

0.1664

 Yes

1683 (82.1)

 

973 (58.8)

681 (41.2)

 

 No

368 (17.9)

 

226 (62.8)

134 (37.2)

 

Pain intensitya, mean (sd)

 Lower back pain (LBP)

6.70 (2.02)

41

5.45 (1.62)

8.55 (0.73)

 Leg pain

3.04 (2.94)

44

2.51 (2.62)

3.84 (3.22)

 < 0.0001

LBP duration, n (%)

 

13

  

 < 0.0001

 1–7 days

961 (46.4)

 

464 (22.9)

476 (23.5)

 

 1 week–3 months

743 (35.9)

 

479 (23.6)

255 (12.6)

 

 3–12 months

152 (7.3)

 

113 (5.6)

35 (1.7)

 

 12 + months

214 (10.3)

 

152 (7.5)

56 (2.8)

 

Medication for LPB, n (%)

 

39

  

 < 0.0001

 Yes, prescription medication

355 (17.4)

 

142 (40.6)

208 (59.4)

 

 Yes, non-prescription medication

686 (33.6)

 

357 (53.6)

309 (46.4)

 

 No

1002 (49.1)

 

692 (70.2)

294 (29.8)

 

Roland Morris Disability Questionnaireb, mean (sd)

12.72 (5.45)

155

10.92 (5.33)

15.40 (4.39)

 < 0.0001

Mental healthc, mean (sd)

 Depressed

3.02 (3.96)

31

2.70 (2.76)

3.52 (3.16)

 < 0.0001

 Stressed/anxious

3.85 (2.95)

25

3.62 (2.85)

4.22 (3.08)

 < 0.0001

Muskuloskeletal pain, n (%)

 Head

726 (34.9)

0

415 (57.7)

304 (42.3)

0.2068

 Neck

910 (43.7)

0

519 (58.1)

375 (42.0)

0.2152

 Chest

116 (5.6)

0

65 (56.0)

51 (44.0)

0.4232

 Stomach

240 (11.5)

0

130 (54.2)

110 (45.8)

0.0689

 Shoulders

850 (40.8)

0

496 (59.5)

337 (40.5)

0.9788

 Elbows

147 (7.1)

0

86 (59.7)

58 (40.3)

0.9709

 Arms

217 (10.4)

0

117 (55.2)

95 (44.8)

0.1688

 Hands

235 (11.3)

0

122 (52.8)

109 (47.2)

0.0261

 Hips

552 (26.5)

0

306 (56.9)

232 (43.1)

0.1368

 Knees

558 (26.8)

0

314 (57.4)

233 (42.6)

0.2258

 Legs

502 (24.1)

0

287 (58.6)

203 (41.4)

0.6022

 Feet

371 (17.8)

0

219 (60.5)

143 (39.5)

0.6946

 Other

90 (4.3)

0

65 (73.9)

23 (26.1)

0.0052

 No pain

337 (16.2)

0

205 (62.1)

125 (37.9)

0.3040

Self-rated general health, n (%)

 

639

  

0.0037

 Excellent

221 (15.3)

 

135 (63.1)

79 (36.9)

 

 Very good

604 (41.9)

 

369 (62.1)

225 (37.9)

 

 Fine

378 (26.2)

 

217 (58.3)

155 (41.7)

 

 Fair

204 (14.1)

 

104 (51.5)

98 (48.5)

 

 Poor

36 (2.49)

 

13 (37.1)

22 (62.9)

 

Physical ressourcesd, mean (sd)

 Aerobic fitness

5.17 (1.86)

58

5.27 (1.80)

4.99 (1.93)

0.0007

 Muscular strength

5.86 (1.71)

57

5.88 (1.63)

5.81 (1.81)

0.3778

 Endurance

5.71 (1.90)

59

5.78 (1.83)

5.61 (2.00)

0.0548

 Flexibility

5.00 (1.95)

60

5.04 (1.87)

4.92 (2.05)

0.1544

 Balance

5.65 (1.87)

60

5.66 (1.79)

5.64 (1.99)

0.7751

  1. aPain was rated on numeric rating scales (NRS) 0–10 (higher score indicating worse pain)
  2. bThe Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire 0–23 (higher score indicating more disability)
  3. cMental health was assessed by the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire 0–10 (higher score indicating worse mental health)
  4. dPhysical resources was assessed on a visual analog scale from 1 (poor) to 9 (excellent)
  5. ep-value of a chi-squared test (categorical variables) or t-test (continuous variables)