Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant characteristics at baseline

From: Is blinding in studies of manual soft tissue mobilisation of the back possible? A feasibility randomised controlled trial with Swiss graduate students

Characteristic

Active manual soft tissue mobilisation

(nā€‰=ā€‰11)

Control

(nā€‰=ā€‰13)

Age ā€” median (IQR)

28 (27 to 30)

28 (28 to 32)

Gender ā€” N (%)

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒFemale

7 (64%)

10 (77%)

ā€ƒMale

4 (36%)

3 (23%)

ā€ƒOther or prefer not to say

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Manual therapy experience ā€” N (%)

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒProviding only

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

ā€ƒReceiving only

2 (18%)

2 (15%)

ā€ƒProviding and receiving

1 (9%)

2 (15%)

ā€ƒNo experience

8 (73%)

9 (69%)

Upper back ache, pain, or discomforta ā€” N (%)

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒNone

9 (82%)

10 (77%)

ā€ƒYes ā€“ slightly uncomfortable

2 (18%)

3 (23%)

ā€ƒYes ā€“ moderately or very uncomfortable

0

0

Lower back ache, pain, or discomforta ā€” N (%)

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒNone

10 (91%)

12 (92%)

ā€ƒYes ā€“ slightly uncomfortable

1 (9%)

1 (8%)

ā€ƒYes ā€“ moderately or very uncomfortable

0

0

Self-reported back flexibilityb ā€” N (%)

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒGood or very good

1 (9%)

4 (31%)

ā€ƒAverage

9 (82%)

8 (62%)

ā€ƒPoor or very poor

1 (9%)

1 (8%)

ROM measurements (degrees) ā€” median (IQR)

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒROM, flexion

127.0 (114.5 to 138.0)

132.0 (129.8 to 141.5)

ā€ƒROM, extension

43.0 (27.5 to 53.0)

44.0 (33.8 to 52.0)

  1. Abbreviations: deg, degrees; IQR, interquartile range; ROM, range of motion; SD, standard deviation
  2. a Adapted from the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire [21]
  3. b Adapted from the International Fitness Scale [22]