Radial neck fracture presenting to a Chiropractic clinic: a case report and literature review
© Daniels et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 16 September 2013
Accepted: 24 March 2014
Published: 1 April 2014
The purpose of this case report is to describe a patient that presented with a Mason type II radial neck fracture approximately three weeks following a traumatic injury.
A 59-year old female presented to a chiropractic practice with complaints of left lateral elbow pain distal to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus and pain provocation with pronation, supination and weight bearing. The complaint originated three weeks prior following a fall on her left elbow while hiking.
Intervention and outcome
Plain film radiographs of the left elbow and forearm revealed a transverse fracture of the radial neck with 2mm displacement--classified as a Mason Type II fracture. The patient was referred for medical follow-up with an orthopedist.
This report discusses triage of an elbow fracture presenting to a chiropractic clinic. This case study demonstrates the thorough clinical examination, imaging and decision making that assisted in appropriate patient diagnosis and management.
KeywordsElbow fracture Radial head fracture Chiropractic
Traumatic injuries to the forearm are a common occurrence in the emergency room setting. They occasionally present in the private practice setting, especially as a chronic presentation. It is easy for the clinician to ignore the obvious diagnosis of fracture due to the length of time the patient has endured this condition. Fractures of the radial head are relatively common. They represent approximately 5.4 percent of all fractures, between 1.5 and 4.5 percent of fractures in adults, and approximately one third of all fractures of the elbow [1–5]. The vast majority of these fractures occur in individuals between the ages of 30-60 years, with a mean age between 45 and 45.9 years and are more common in women than men . It has been reported that in children the incidence of radial head and neck fractures is up to 1.3% . Mechanism of injury is usually a fall on an outstretched arm, and in rare cases, direct trauma [1–3, 6–9]. These fractures are typically seen in isolation, but may be accompanied by other fractures, dislocations or soft tissue injuries. Because of their proximity, the medial collateral ligament, lateral collateral ligament and interosseous ligaments are most prone to injury with radial head fractures. The radial head of the elbow acts as a secondary stabilizer of the joint creating 30% of the elbow’s resistance to valgus forces as such it is prone to compressive forces and hyperextension injuries.
Symptoms typically include pain and tenderness along the lateral aspect of elbow and a limited range of motion (ROM) in the elbow, forearm or wrist. A thorough physical exam should include an inspection of ROM and longitudinal and rotational joint stability, evaluating the joint for resistance to elbow flexion and extension and forearm pronation and supination; stressing varus and valgus positions of the joint. Particular attention should be paid to the presence of pain and tenderness in the interosseous membrane.
A 59 year-old female presented to a private chiropractic clinic complaining of a three week history of generalized left elbow pain with no symptomatic referral to the upper extremity. The injury began immediately following a fall onto the left elbow while hiking. She could not recall the exact mechanism of her fall. The pain was described as deep and was exacerbated by weight bearing exercise and twisting motions such as opening a door. She had attempted to self-manage her symptoms with home use of a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit, which increased her symptoms, and over the counter non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID’s) medications which had no apparent effect. She denied any history of swelling, numbness/tingling, locking sensation, or previous elbow injuries.
Relevant examination findings revealed an alert and oriented, non-distressed, patient with no signs of upper extremity bracing or splinting. Active range of motion (ROM) of the left elbow was full in all directions and pain was present at end-range supination and pronation of the forearm. Palpation revealed significant tenderness slightly distal to the left radial head and along the lateral forearm, and hypertonicity of the forearm extensor muscle group was noted. To assess for lateral epicondylitis Mill’s and Cozen’s tests were performed, both provoking discomfort in the proximal forearm. The discomfort could not be reproduced at the lateral epicondyle. Valgus and varus stress testing of the elbow provoked significant discomfort distal to the lateral epicondyle, but again were not consistent with expected positive testing.
Bilateral upper extremity neurological examination was within normal limits, revealing 2+ triceps, biceps, and wrist reflexes, intact sensation to light touch of C5 to T1 dermatomes, and 5/5 motor testing of C5 to T1 myotomes. Upper limb tension test was negative for upper extremity radicular pain provocation.
Three days post initial consultation, the patient’s X-ray results were received from the imaging center and the patient was referred to a general medical specialist for care. A clinical report and the radiologists report were forwarded to the referred physician. Verbal follow-up with the patient two-weeks later revealed that she had been referred to an orthopedic specialist by her primary care physician. The orthopedist elected not to cast the fracture due to small degree of displacement, lack of significant swelling, and range of motion within normal limits. She was restricted from performing any weight bearing exercise and was instructed to return in one month for follow-up X-ray to assess the healing of the fracture site. At four-weeks following the initial evaluation, a repeated radiographic examination demonstrated healing of the fracture site. At three month telephone follow-up the patient reported full use of her elbow with no pain in any ranges of motion.
The Mason classification system is used to classify radial head and neck fractures and is useful when assessing further treatment options . The classification system consists of three types: Type I, non-displaced (or small marginal) radial head or neck fracture; Type II, marginal fractures with displacement including impaction, depression and angulation; and Type III, comminuted fractures involving the entire radial head [10, 16, 17]. Type I fractures are initially treated with 3 to 5 days of immobilization. After pain has subsided, gentle active range of motion at the elbow should begin. The immobilizing splint should be replaced by a sling as range of motion exercises begin. Follow-up radiographs are obtained to ensure that no further displacement has occurred. The patient may return to full, unrestricted activity in 3 to 4 weeks in most cases. The criterion used for return to activity is the level of comfort reported by the patient.
When Type II fractures have only a single displacement with greater than 3mm, or when the articular surface of the fracture fragment diverges more than 30 degrees, open reduction internal fixation surgery with small screws is recommended . In most Mason Type II and III fractures in which displacement and/or comminution are noted on radiographs the elbow joint should be aspirated and injected with local anesthetic. This allows for careful passive range of motion examination to determine the presence or absence of mechanical blockage due to displaced fragments through the articular surface. If no mechanical blockage is identified, and if the fracture is not displaced or angulated extensively, conservative treatment is appropriate .
Sites of injuries with radial head fractures
Soft tissue injuries
Distal radioulnar joint fractures
Interosseous membrane disruption
Lateral collateral ligament injuries
Medial collateral ligament injuries
Distal radioulnar joint and radial head fracture (Essex-Lopresti)
Radial head fx, coronoid fx, elbow dislocation (terrible triad)
Conservative treatment of Type II and Type III fractures of the radial head consists of immobilization for 7 to 10 days in a posterior splint. Splinting the elbow in flexion versus extension does not affect outcome . The elbow should be splinted at the angle of greatest comfort.  Radiographs should be repeated at appropriate intervals to ensure that further displacement or loose body formation has not occurred. Graduated mobilization may be achieved using a functional fracture brace with controlled hinges and active range of motion exercises. Several reports show excellent results using conservative treatment measures for even the most extensive comminuted radial head fractures [22, 23]. The keys to success are exclusion of cases in which mechanical blockage is present and the implementation of early, controlled active range of motion . After the orthopedic goals of stabilization have been achieved, the rehabilitative objectives of restoring normal ranges of motion and restoring muscle strength to the supporting musculature should be met.
The complex motion of the proximal radioulnar joint includes both pronation and supination. These movements occur in conjunction with simultaneous movement of the distal radioulnar joint . Proximally, supination and pronation occur with spinning of the radial head within the fibro-osseous ring formed by the annular ligament and radial notch of the ulna . During supination, the proximal surface of the articular disc remains in contact with the ulna head and at end range the palmar capsular ligament is stretched to its maximal length creating stiffness and stabilization of the joint. . Whereas full pronation elongates the dorsal capsular ligament at the distal radioulnar joint and slackens the palmar capsular ligament . Rehabilitation is an important part in re-establishing normal kinematics of the joint.
Radial head fractures are relatively common and therefore it is important for the chiropractic physician to have knowledge of their diagnosis and treatment strategies. The clinical presentation, classification, and treatment options of radial head fractures vary depending on the amount of radial head displacement and soft tissue injury. This case study demonstrates thorough clinical examination, imaging and triage to assist in appropriate patient diagnosis and management. In this case the minimally displaced Type II Mason fracture did not require surgical intervention to return to full functionality.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Morrey BF: Radial Head Fracture. The Elbow and Its Disorders. 2000, Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 3,Google Scholar
- Black WS, Becker JA: Common forearm fractures in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2009, 80 (10): 1096-1102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ditsios KT, Stavridis SI, Christodoulou AG: The effect of haematoma aspiration on intra-articular pressure and pain relief following Mason I radial head fractures. Injury. 2011, 42: 362-365. 10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herbertsson P, Josefsson PO, Hasserius R, Karlsson C, Besjakov J, Karlsson M: Uncomplicated Mason type-II and III fractures of the radial head and neck in adults. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004, 86-A: 569-574.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herbertsson P, Josefsson PO, Hasserius R, Besjakov J, Nyqvist F, Karlsson MK: Fractures of the radial head and neck treated with radial head excision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004, 86-A: 1925-1930.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kovar FM, Jaindl M, Thalhammer G, Rupert S, Platzer P, Endler G, Vielgut I, Kutscha-Lissberg F: Incidence and analysis of radial head and neck fractures. World J Orthop. 2013, 4 (2): 80-84. doi:10.5312/wjo.v4.i2.80. Print 2013 Apr 18,PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Riet RP, Morrey BF: Documentation of associated injuries occurring with radial head fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008, 466: 130-134. 10.1007/s11999-007-0064-8PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaas L, van Riet RP, Vroemen JP, Eygendaal D: The epidemiology of radial head fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010, 19: 520-523. 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.015View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karlsson MK, Herbertsson P, Nordqvist A, Besjakov J, Josefsson PO, Hasserius R: Comminuted fractures of the radial head. Acta Orthop. 2010, 81: 224-227. 10.3109/17453671003717815PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mason ML: Some observations on fractures of the head of the radius with a review of one hundred cases. Br J Surg. 1954, 42 (172): 123-132. 10.1002/bjs.18004217203View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruchelsman DE, Christoforou D, Jupiter JB: Fractures of the radial head and neck. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013, 95 (5): 469-478. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.01989,View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Broberg MA, Morrey BF: Results of treatment of fracture-dislocations of the elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987, 216: 109-119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomas TT: Fractures of the head and neck of the radius. Ann Surg. 1907, 46: 280-291. doi:10.1097/00000658-190708000-00014,PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnston GW: A follow-up of one hundred cases of fractures of the head of the radius with a review of the literature. Ulster Med J. 1962, 31: 51-56.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matthew PK, Athwal GS, King GJ: Terrible triad injury of the elbow: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009, 17 (3): 137-151.Google Scholar
- Iannuzzi NP, Leopold SS: In brief: the mason classification of radial head fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012, 470: 1799-1802. 10.1007/s11999-012-2319-2PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mason JA, Shutkin NM: Immediate active motion treatment for fractures of the head and neck of the radius. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1943, 76: 731-737.Google Scholar
- Shmueli O, Herold HZ: Compression screwing of displaced fractures of the head of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981, 63: 535-538.Google Scholar
- Doerr GH, Carmichael JP, Buchberger DJ, Pajaczkowski J, Spina AA: The Elbow, Wrist, and Hand. Conservative Management of Sports Injuries. Edited by: Hyde T. 2007, 543-611. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2,Google Scholar
- Thompson DJ: Comparison of flexion versus extension splinting in the treatment of Mason type I radial head and neck fractures. JOrthop Trauma. 1988, 2: 117-119. 10.1097/00005131-198802010-00005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Watson JT: Fractures of the forearm and elbow. Clin Sports Med. 1990, 9: 59-83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller KG, Drennan DB, Mavlahn DJ: Treatment of displaced segmental radial head fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984, 63: 712-717.Google Scholar
- Weseley MS, Barenfield PA, Eisenstein HL: Closed treatment of isolated radial head fractures. J Trauma. 1983, 23: 36-39. 10.1097/00005373-198301000-00007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neumann D: Elbow and Forearm Complex. Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System: Foundations for Physical Rehabilitation. Edited by: Neumann D. 2012, 133-171. St. Louis, MO: Mosby,Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.