Skip to main content

Table 1 Description of included studies

From: Effects of manual therapies on stability in people with musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review

Study

Pain region

Intervention group M(SD). Sham group 2 M(SD).

Intervention

Comparison

Pain Measure

Risk of falls measure

Bennell 2005 [21]

Hip OA

Physiotherapy group 67.4 (8.6). Placebo group 69.8 (7.5).

Physiotherapy (massage, taping, mobilisation) and self-management

Sham ultrasound

VAS

Step test

Bennell 2014 [20]

Hip OA

Intervention group 64.5 (8.6). Sham group 62.7 (6.4).

Mobilisation and/or soft tissue and/or manipulation plus exercise

Sham ultrasound

VAS

Sit-to-stand, step test, gait speed, 4-square step test

Beselga 2016 [23]

Hip OA

Intervention group 78.3 (6.3). Placebo group 77.5 (6.9)

Mobilisation of the hip

Simulated mobilisation

NRS11

TUG*, sit-to-stand*, gait speed*

Abbott 2013 [19]

Hip or Knee OA

Manual therapy + usual care group 67.3 (10.2). Exercise + usual care group 66.9(8.2). Usual care group 66.1 (10.7).

Mobilisation and/or soft tissue and/or manipulation and usual care

Exercise and usual care; usual care

NRS11*, WOMAC*

TUG, sit-to-stand, gait speed

Abbott 2015 [18]

Knee OA

Manual therapy + exercise group 61 (12). Exercise group 64 (10)

Mobilisation and/or soft tissue and/or manipulation plus exercise

Exercise

NRS11*, WOMAC*

TUG, sit-to-stand*, gait speed

Cheawthamai 2014 [25]

Knee OA

Manual therapy group 66.62 (8.77). Exercise group 64.05 (7.86).

Self-manual therapy and exercise

Exercise

VAS

Gait speed

Cortés Godoy 2014 [26]

Knee OA

Manual therapy group 85(median) (81–89(1st and 3rd quartiles)). Exercise group 84 (median) (82–84.5 (1st and 3rd quartiles)).

Massage and exercise

Exercise

VAS

TUG

Deyle 2000 [29]

Knee OA

Physiotherapy group 64 (9.9). Exercise group 62.2 (9.2)

Physiotherapy (mobilisation, massage) and exercise

Sub-therapeutic ultrasound

WOMAC

Gait speed

Deyle 2005 [28]

Knee OA

Physiotherapy group 64 (9.9). Exercise group 62.2 (9.2)

Physiotherapy (mobilisation, massage) and exercise

Exercise

WOMAC

Gait speed

Fitzgerald et al. 2016 [31]

Knee OA

Exercise + manual therapy group 58 (9.8). Exercise group 58.3 (10).

Manual therapy and exercise

Exercise

WOMAC(* at nine weeks)

NRS11

TUG, sit-to-stand, gait speed

French 2013 [32]

Knee OA

Exercise + manual therapy group 58 (9.8). Exercise group 58.3 (10)

Manual therapy and exercise

Exercise

NRS11

Sit-to-stand, gait speed

Jardine 2012 [34]

Knee OA

Osteopathic group 63.20 (7.97). Control group 63.73 (9.63)

Osteopathic fascial release

No treatment

VAS

Step test

Lee 2017 [36]

Neck pain

Manual therapy + exercise group 59 (2.4). Exercise group 58 (1.6)

Therapeutic exercise with joint mobilisation applied to cervical and upper thoracic spine

Therapeutic exercise alone

VAS*, NDI*

Static balance ability

Maiers 2014 [37]

Neck pain

Manual therapy + exercise group 59 (2.4). Exercise group 58 (1.6).

Chiropractic (manipulation, mobilisation, traction, massage) and exercise

Exercise

NRS11*, NDI

TUG

Rudolfsson 2014 [38]

Neck pain

Massage group 51.2 (9.0). Neck coordination exercise group 50.7 (8.6). Strength training exercise group 51.6 (9.0).

Massage

Exercise

NRS11

Balance (COP)*

Bennell 2010 [22]

Spine pain

Physiotherapy group 66.2 (8.0). Control group 66.3 (11.8).

Mobilisation, massage, postural taping and exercise

No intervention

NRS11

TUG

Dougherty 2014 [30]

LBP

Manual therapy group 76.99 (6.77). Control group 77.04 (6.81)

HVLA spine manipulation and/or flexion distraction and/or mobilisation

Sham ultrasound

VAS, ODI*

TUG

Goertz et al., 2016 [43]

LBP

High velocity manipulation group 44.1 (10.6). Low velocity mobilisation group 44.5 (10.2). Control group 44.4 (10.5).

Spinal manipulation, spinal mobilisation

Sham control

None

Postural sway (blindfolded and on soft surface, without shoes); muscle activity (EMG) of paraspinal muscles in response to an unexpected sudden load.

Hicks et al. 2016 [33]

LBP

Intervention group 69.5 (7.0). Exercise group 70.7 (6.8)

Passive control intervention (heat, ultrasound and massage)

Trunk muscle training program (exercises) augmented with neuromuscular electrical stimulation

Modified Oswestry LBP Questionnaire

NRS11

TUG test;* gait speed*; Tampa scale of kinesiophobia; global rating of functional improvement

Kim 2015 [35]

LBP

Manual therapy group 59.2 (6.5). Exercise group 62.6 (6.6)

Myofascial therapy and muscle energy technique plus exercise

Exercise

VAS*, ODI*

Balance system SD*

Ruhe 2012 [39]

LBP

Manual therapy group 39.8 (10.5). Control group 41.5 (5.5)

Manipulation, mobilisation and/or massage

No intervention

NRS11*

Balance (COP)*

Trampas 2014 [40]

LBP

Manual Therapy with massage and exercise 35.8 (7.16). Exercise group 33.4 (12.01)

Massage and exercise

Exercise

None

Biodex stability system

Yu et al. 2016 [42]

LBP

Myofascial release group 70.4 (3.2). Exercise group 69.4 (4.1)

Myofascial release of the iliopsoas

Exercises

NRS11

Balance (changes in pressure applied to each force plate and shows the stability of the centre of the gravity).

Remodified Schober’s test (RST)

Castro-Sanchez 2011 [24]

Fibromyalgia

Myofascial therapy group 55.3. Sham ultrasound 53.5

Myofascial therapy

Sham ultrasound

McGill, VAS*, NRS11*

Postural stability

Cuesta-Barriuso 2014 [27]

Ankle arthropathy

Mobilisation of the ankle group 37.6 (13.1). Traction of ankles group 33.5 (11.7)

Mobilisation of the ankle, infrared thermotherapy, exercises, ice

Traction of ankles, infrared thermotherapy, exercises and ice

VAS

Romberg’s test

van den Dolder 2006 [41]

Knee pain

Massage group 55 (11). No intervention group 52 [18]

Massage

No intervention (wait list)

Patellofemoral pain severity questionnaire

Step test*

  1. Table descriptions: COP centre of pressure, GP general practitioner, LBP low back pain, NDI neck disability index, NRS11 numerical rating scale (scored 0–10), OA osteoarthritis, ODI Oswestry disability index, TUG timed up & go test, VAS visual analogue scale; WOMAC - Western Ontario and McMaster Universities arthritis index
  2. *significant between group difference on this measure