Skip to main content
Download PDF

Correction: Why is the prevailing model of joint manipulation (still) incorrect?

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies volume 31, Article number: 2 (2023) Cite this article

The Original Article was published on 09 December 2022


Correction: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies (2022) 30:51 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-022-00460-2


Following the publication of the original article [1], two errors were identified in the article. The updated text is given below, and the change has been highlighted in bold typeface.


Under the Cracking joints header:


After this crack, with increasing load the line returns to a near horizontal gradient once again, until it reaches a maximum separation of approximately 4 mm; a relatively large separation for an MCP joint!


In the legend of Fig. 11:


MR images before and after cavitation in an MCP joint. The original caption of this figure, reproduced from Kawchuk et al. [33], was “T1 static images of the left hand in the resting phase before cracking (left). The same hand following cracking with the addition of a post-cracking distraction force (right). Note the dark, intraarticular void (yellow arrow)”.


The original article [1] has been corrected.

Reference

  1. Evans DW. Why is the prevailing model of joint manipulation (still) incorrect? Chiropr Man Therap. 2022;30:51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-022-00460-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK

    David W. Evans

  2. Research Centre, University College of Osteopathy, London, UK

    David W. Evans

Authors
  1. David W. Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David W. Evans.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Evans, D.W. Correction: Why is the prevailing model of joint manipulation (still) incorrect?. Chiropr Man Therap 31, 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-023-00476-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-023-00476-2

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies

ISSN: 2045-709X