Skip to main content

Table 7 Panel’s self-reported use, perceived clinical validity and effects of the practitioner’s beliefs/characteristics (Round 1; n = 39)

From: Musculoskeletal practitioners’ perceptions of contextual factors that may influence chronic low back pain outcomes: a modified Delphi study

Rank

Sub-set

Statement

Self-reported use (%)

Valid (%)

Enhance Treatment (%)

Practitioner’s beliefs and characteristics (k = 7 statements)

1.5

Mindset/attitude

Remaining attentive and fully focused on the patient throughout the appointment

100 (n = 39)

89.7 (n = 35)

84.6 (n = 33)

1.5

Mindset/attitude

Being genuine and honest to instil a sense of trustworthiness and authenticity

100 (n = 39)

87.2 (n = 34)

82.1 (n = 32)

3*

Mindset/attitude

Displaying self-confidence without appearing arrogant or dismissive

97.4 (n = 38)

84.6 (n = 33)

79.5 (n = 31)

4

Expertise/credibility

Clearly communicating your expectations (i.e., what you anticipate will occur) whilst administering care

94.9 (n = 37)

84.6 (n = 33)

74.4 (n = 29)

5*

Expertise/credibility

Prescribing or administering treatments you believe and expect to be effective

92.3 (n = 36)

82.1 (n = 32)

76.9 (n = 30)

6*

Expertise/credibility

Wearing a laboratory coat/medical apparel or tailored/formal clothing to symbolise professionalism

59.0 (n = 23)

53.8 (n = 21)

59.0 (n = 23)

7*

Expertise/credibility

Using indicators of expertise/high status (e.g., health qualifications, professional memberships) in offices or correspondence

56.4 (n = 22)

59.0 (n = 23)

66.7 (n = 26)

  1. If two or more statements had equal percentages of self-reported use, then fractional ranks were computed by averaging the ordinal ranks to reflect ties. For example, rank 1.5 indicates joint “first/second” (i.e., (1 + 2)/2 = 1.5)
  2. *This statement was revised between the two Delphi rounds