Skip to main content
Download PDF

COVID-19-specific adult basic life support guideline strategies for chiropractors and other healthcare providers to maximize the safety and efficacy of resuscitation: a commentary

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies volume 31, Article number: 16 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The emergence of an unprecedented novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-C0V-2), which causes the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has created new scenarios in basic life support (BLS) management. According to current evidence, SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted airborne in aerosol particles during resuscitation. Research evidence found an alarming global increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare providers are legally obliged to respond to cardiac arrest as soon as possible. Chiropractors will likely encounter potential exercise-related and non-exercise-related cardiac emergencies at some point in their professional lives. They have a duty of care to respond to emergencies such as cardiac arrest. Chiropractors are increasingly involved in providing care, including emergency care, for athletes and spectators at sporting events. Also, exercise-related cardiac arrest in adult patients may occur during exercise testing or rehabilitation with exercise prescriptions in chiropractic and other healthcare settings. Little is known about the COVID-19 BLS guidelines for chiropractors. Knowledge of the current COVID-19-specific adult BLS guidelines is essential to developing an emergency response plan for the on-field and sideline management of exercise-related cardiac arrest and non-athletic, non-exercise-related cardiac arrest.

Main text

Seven peer-reviewed articles on the COVID-19-specific BLS guidelines, including two updates, were reviewed for this commentary. Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, the national and international resuscitation organizations recommended interim COVID-19-specific BLS guidelines with precaution, resuscitation, and education strategies. BLS safety is paramount. A precautionary approach with the bare minimum of appropriate personal protective equipment for resuscitation is recommended. There was disagreement among the COVID-19 BLS guidelines on the level of personal protective equipment. All healthcare professionals should also undergo self-directed BLS e-learning and virtual skill e-training. The summarized COVID-19-specific adult BLS guideline strategies and protocols are tabled, respectively.

Conclusions

This commentary provides a practical overview and highlights current evidence-based intervention strategies of the COVID-19-specific adult BLS guidelines that may help chiropractors and other healthcare providers reduce BLS-related exposures to SARS-CoV-2 and the risks of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and maximize the efficacy of resuscitation. This study is relevant to and impacts future COVID-19-related research in areas such as infection prevention and control.

Background

The emergence of an unprecedented novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-C0V-2), which causes the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has created new scenarios in basic life support (BLS) management. SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted airborne in aerosol particles, according to recent evidence [1]. According to the American Heart Association 2020 Interim COVID-19 Guidance, SARS-CoV2 is highly transmissible during resuscitation and has a high morbidity and mortality rate, complicating the emerging response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) [2].

Cardiac arrest is a time-critical, life-threatening emergency requiring prompt, urgent, and appropriate interventions. The biggest challenge during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is to ensure the best possible chance of survival for an OHCA patient without compromising the safety of the healthcare rescuers [2,3,4,5]. According to the Australasian College of Emergency Medicine, it is important to balance the appropriateness of resuscitation against the risk of infection to manage cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic [3]. There are risks and concerns of SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission during AGPs, including chest compressions, defibrillation, bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation, and positive-pressure ventilation [5]. Considering the rapid spread of the Omicron variant of concern for SARS-CoV-2, the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the appropriate use of a respirator for aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) along with other personal protective equipment (PPE) by healthcare providers providing care in any setting to patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 [6].

A recent systematic review and meta-analysis found an alarming global increase in OHCA during COVID-19 [7]. The SARS-CoV-2-induced systemic inflammation could lead to cardiovascular complications such as acute coronary syndrome and myocarditis. Little is known about the incidence of OHCA in chiropractic and other healthcare settings before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, a 5 years cross-sectional study found that 36% of general medical practice was involved in OHCA, and 13% was involved in more than one OHCA [8]. A recent study from the Swedish Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation from 2011 to 2014 and 2016 to 2018 found 635 cases of exercise-related OHCA outside of the home [9].

Chiropractors will likely encounter potential exercise-related and non-exercise-related cardiac emergencies at some point in their professional lives. They have a duty of care to respond to emergencies such as cardiac arrest. Like other healthcare providers, chiropractors are increasingly involved in providing care at sporting events. Because sports chiropractors can be called on to provide BLS for athletes and spectators, knowledge of the current COVID-19 BLS guidelines is essential to developing an emergency response plan for the on-field and sideline management of exercise-related cardiac arrest and non-athletic, non-exercise-related cardiac arrest. Moreover, exercise-related cardiac arrest may occur during exercise testing or rehabilitation with exercise prescriptions for patients in chiropractic clinical settings.

Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, the national and international resuscitation organizations recommended interim COVID-19-specific BLS guidelines [2,3,4,5, 10,11,12] with precaution, resuscitation, and education strategies based on expert opinion and consensus. Little is known about the COVID-19 BLS guidelines for chiropractors. This commentary will discuss the current evidence of CPR-associated SARS-CoV-2 transmission and the COVID-19-specific adult BLS guidelines for chiropractors and other healthcare providers, with guideline strategies in Table 1 and guideline protocols in Table 2, respectively.

Table 1 Summary of current intervention strategies of the COVID-19-specific adult BLS guidelines for healthcare providers to maximize the safety and efficacy of resuscitation
Full size table
Table 2 Do’s and Don’ts of the COVID-19 adult BLS guideline protocols for healthcare providers
Full size table

Current evidence of CPR-associated SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission

There is increasing evidence of the possible risk of CPR-associated SARS-CoV-2 aerosol transmission. A recent systematic review found indirect evidence that CPR was associated with aerosol generation and the transmission of infection but was unsure whether chest compression or defibrillation caused bioaerosols or the transmission of COVID-19 to rescuers [13]. Another systematic review concluded that there was sufficient growing evidence of agreement across different international guidelines to classify certain resuscitation procedures, such as intubation, CPR, and manual ventilation, as AGPs [14]. In early 2020, the WHO categorized CPR as an AGP [15, 16]. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that chest compression is not an AGP with a risk of transmission [17]. Bio-aerosol nuclei may remain in the air of a poorly ventilated room for a longer time. Notably, viable SARS-CoV-2 can persist in aerosols for 3 h [18]. A recent simulation and cadaver study found that most aerosols spread in the direction of the provider during chest compression-only CPR without any airway device and that using a surgical mask or an oxygen mask as a barrier device on the patient’s face would reduce the aerosol spread [19]. In the 2022 interim COVID-19 adult BLS update, the American Heart Association aligns with the most recent WHO and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; it now considers CPR and all its components (e.g., chest compressions, ventilation, and defibrillation) aerosol-generating [5].

The COVID-19-specific adult BLS guideline strategies for chiropractors and other healthcare providers

Precaution strategies

COVID-19 resuscitation safety is paramount, and the priorities are (1) the self, (2) the colleagues and bystanders, and (3) the patient [10]. Prehospital healthcare providers should follow the standard droplet plus aerosol precautions when resuscitating suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients [2, 3, 5, 10, 11]. In determining the appropriateness of resuscitation, it is paramount to consider the severity of the illness and the rescuer’s age and comorbidities [2].

There was disagreement among the COVID-19 BLS guidelines on the level of PPE. A precautionary approach with the bare minimum of appropriate PPE for AGPs is recommended to protect healthcare providers from contracting SARS-CoV-2 in suspected COVID-19 patients with BLS-associated AGPs [12, 17]. Cautiously, CPR should not be started on any patient with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 until the team is fully attired with appropriate PPE [11] against both airborne and droplet particles [2]. All healthcare rescuers should use airborne-precaution PPE like a respirator of the European Union Standard filtering facepiece (FFP) 2, FFP3, or the United States National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-certified N95 [2, 6, 10] along with other PPE (gown, gloves, and eye protection) for AGPs with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients [6].

Resuscitation strategies

Prioritizing defibrillation

In the chain of survival [20, 21], prioritizing rapid defibrillation before chest compressions [2,3,4, 10, 11] and attention to reversible causes of cardiac arrest remain the critically modified interventions [3] during the COVID-19 pandemic. Because the early return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) may negate the need for chest compressions and ventilation, which are classified as AGPs [14], or the need for invasive airway management and invasive ventilation. Notably, different from other COVID-19 BLS guidelines, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation and the European Resuscitation Council suggested defibrillation before donning airborne-precaution PPE for AGPs in situations where the benefits might exceed the risks [4, 10], because of the potential for defibrillation within the first few minutes to achieve a sustained ROSC and the unlikelihood of defibrillation generating an aerosol [4, 10].

Prioritizing oxygenation and ventilation

Supplementing the chain of survival during the COVID-19 pandemic and the benefit of supplemental oxygen during CPR remain uncertain and debatable [22, 23]. However, ROSC cannot be achieved without re-oxygenating the ischemic myocardium following cardiac arrest [23]. Hence, for agonal breathing, consider passive oxygenation overlaid with a surgical mask (if available) [5, 12] when a BVM with a high-efficiency-particulate-air filter is not being utilized [5, 12]. As a result, during chest compression-only CPR [2], oxygenation and ventilation should be prioritized as soon as possible [10]. Vigilantly avoid or minimize positive-pressure ventilation by a BVM. Two rescuers should be present if required to allow a two-handed, tight seal [3, 11]. Preferably, using a BVM with a high-efficiency-particulate-air filter before chest compressions, if available, will minimize exposure to SARS-CoV-2 [5, 10,11,12].

Emphasizing the high quality of chest compression-only CPR

Chest compression is a critical component of effective CPR to perfuse vital organs during cardiac arrest. Importantly, initiate chest compressions immediately in the event of a witnessed sudden cardiac arrest, such as a possible exercise-related OHCA in chiropractic settings. If not already masked, healthcare providers should don their masks without delay or interruption with chest compressions [12]. The COVID-19 adult BLS guidelines [3, 11] also emphasize the concept of high-quality CPR as one of the significant parts of the “chain of survival” [20, 21]. Effective, timely, high-quality manual chest compression-only CPR [3, 11] is an essential element of managing an OHCA to achieve a successful ROSC during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Optimizing chest compression rate, depth, recoil, and fraction

Previous studies suggested that the quality of chest compression delivered was mainly associated with chest compression rate, depth, recoil, and fraction [20, 21, 24]. Chest compression should have the following parameters [11, 23,24,25]: chest compression rates between 100 and 120 per minute and a chest compression depth of about 5–6 cm. Chest compression rates between 100 and 120 per minute [25] were associated with the greatest survival following an OHCA and hospital discharge [26]. The optimal chest compression velocity with full recoil is associated with a significant improvement in survival and a favorable neurological outcome at hospital discharge after an OHCA [27]. A chest compression fraction (CCF) is the proportion of time spent providing chest compressions while the patient is pulseless and in cardiac arrest. Previous observational studies found that shorter pauses [28] or higher CCF were associated with higher odds of survival to hospital discharge for OHCA patients [29, 30]. According to the 2021 and 2022 interim COVID-19 adult BLS guidelines, maximize CCF and pause to intubate only if needed [5, 12].

Attenuating the impact of wearing PPE on the quality of manual chest compression-only CPR

The impact of wearing PPE during the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of manual chest compression-only CPR was left unaddressed in the 2020 COVID-19 BLS guidelines [2,3,4, 10, 11], except for the updates in the 2021 and 2022 COVID-19 BLS guidelines that PPE may have accelerated rescuer fatigue, resulting in decreased CPR quality [5, 12]. Recent studies found a significant increase in adverse reactions such as PPE-induced fatigue [31,32,33,34], thermal discomfort, dizziness, and heat stress [35] among healthcare providers during CPR. Also, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of PPE on the effectiveness of chest compression concluded that the use of PPE compromised the quality of chest compression during CPR significantly [36]. Cooling strategies to attenuate PPE-induced heat strain [37], such as wearing a cooling vest [37] before, during, and after CPR during the COVID-19 pandemic, should be considered, implemented, and followed.

Education strategies

Like other healthcare providers, infectious disease transmission during chiropractic CPR training is a common concern [38]. The European Resuscitation Council highlighted the importance of sustaining BLS and provided interim guidelines for resuscitation education strategies to minimize the risk of infection during the COVID-19 pandemic [10].

Transitioning to the COVID-19 BLS web-based e-education and e-training

Like telehealth education and training, specific web-based BLS e-education and e-training require an innovative, modified approach to the traditional training during the COVID-19 pandemic to host “tele-BLS” courses. All healthcare professionals with a duty of care to respond but rarely treat OHCA patients should also undergo self-directed BLS e-learning and virtual skill e-training [10], including donning and doffing PPE [11, 37]. During e-training, potential self-contamination during the doffing of used PPE [39, 40] due to mucosal exposure of the eye, nose, and mouth by touching the face with the hand(s) should be warned. Also, an appropriate proper doffing-PPE sequence should be demonstrated, practiced, and evaluated with feedback. Many web-based BLS courses and COVID-19-related infection prevention and control courses are available for healthcare providers. Samples of the free WHO web-based COVID-19-relevant courses [41] are:

Conclusions

This commentary is the first article on the current COVID-19-specific adult BLS guidelines for chiropractors to maximize the safety and efficacy of resuscitation. It has relevance and impacts future research in areas such as SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention and control strategies. It provides a practical overview and highlights the current intervention strategies of the COVID-19 interim adult BLS guidelines that may help chiropractors and other healthcare providers reduce BLS-related exposures to SARS-CoV-2 and the risks of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and maximize the efficacy of CPR. Chiropractors and other healthcare providers should follow current COVID-19-specific intervention strategies during the pandemic. Future studies should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of COVID-19-specific interventions in adult BLS guidelines, although studies to assess the effectiveness of interventions may not be ethically feasible.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

AGP:

Aerosol-generating procedure

BLS:

Basic life support

BVM:

Bag-value mask

CCF:

Chest compression fraction

CPR:

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

FFP:

Filtering face piece

HEPA:

High-efficiency-particulate-air

OHCA:

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

PPE:

Personal protective equipment

ROSC:

Return of spontaneous circulation

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Javis M. Aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2: physical principle and implications. Front Public Health. 2020;82:590041. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.590041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Edelson DP, Sasson C, Chan PS, on behalf of AHA ECC Interim COVID guidance authors, et al. Interim guidance for basic & advanced life support in adults, children, and neonates with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Circulation. 2020;141:e933–43. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Craig S, Cubitt M, Jaison A, et al. Management of adult cardiac arrest in the COVID19 era: consensus statement from the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. MJA. 2020;213:126–33. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50699.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Perkins GD, Morley PT, Nolan JP, et al. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation: COVID-19 consensus on science, treatment recommendations and task force insights. Resuscitation. 2020;151:145–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Atkin DL, Sasson C, Hsu A, et al. Interim guidance to health care providers for basic and advanced cardiac life support in adults, children, and neonates with suspected or confirmed COVID-19: from the Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and get with the Guidelines-Resuscitation Adult and Pediatric Task Forces of the American Heart Association in collaboration with the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for Respiratory Care, the Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologist, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Cir Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022;15:e008900. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.008900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on mask use health workers, in light of Omicron variant of concern. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/350925/WHO-2019-nCoV-IPC_Masks-Health_Workers-Omicron_variant-2021.1-eng.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2022.

  7. Lim ZJ, Reddy MP, Afroz A, et al. Incidence and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in the COVID-19 era: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2020;157:248–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.10.025.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bury G, Headon M, Egan M, Dowling J. Cardiac arrest management in general practice in Ireland: a 5-year cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002563. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002563.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Torell MF, Strömsöe A, Herlitz J, et al. Better outcomes from exercise-related out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in males and in the young: findings from the Swedish Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56:1026–31. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-105151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nolan JP, Monsieurs KG, Bossaert L, et al. European resuscitation council COVID-19 guidelines executive summary. Resuscitation. 2020;153:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.06.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Guimaraes HP, Timerman S, Rodrigues RR, et al. Position Statement (Brazilian Society of Cardiology): cardiopulmonary resuscitation of patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19–2020. Arg Bras Cardiol. 2020;114:1078–87. https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20200548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsu A, Sasson C, Kudenchuk PJ, et al. 2021 Interim guidance to health care providers for basic and advanced cardiac life support in adults, children, and neonates with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021;14:e008396. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008396.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Couper K, Taylor-Phillips S, Grove A, et al. COVID-19 in cardiac arrest and infection risk to rescuers: a systematic review. Resuscitation. 2020;151:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson T, Deibert D, Wyatt G, et al. Classification of aerosol-generating procedures: a rapid systematic review. BMJ Open Resp Res. 2020;7:e000730. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000730.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization. Mode of transmission of virus causing COVID-19: Implications for IPC precaution recommendations, scientific brief. 29 March 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/modes-of-transmission-of-virus-causing-covid-19-implications-for-ipc-precaution-recommendations. Accessed 3 Apr 2020

  16. World Health Organization. Infection prevention and control during health care when coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is suspected or confirmed, interim guidance. 29 June 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance-publications. Accessed 8 Jul 2020.

  17. Brown E, Chan LM. Should chest compressions be considered an aerosol-generating procedure? A literature review in response to response to recent guidelines on personal protective equipment for patients with suspected COVID-19. Clin Med. 2020;20:e154–9. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2020-0258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. New Eng J Med. 2020;382:1564–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmc2004973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ott M, Milazzo A, Liebau S, et al. Exploration of strategies to reduce aerosol-spread during chest compressions: a simulation and cadaver model. Resuscitation. 2020;152:192–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.05.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cummins RO. Emergency medical services and sudden cardiac arrest: The “chain of survival” concept. Annu Rev Publ Health. 1993;14:313–33. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.14.050193.001525.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Perkins GD, Handley AJ, Koster RW, et al. European Resuscitation Council guidelines 2015: section 2: adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation. 2015;95:81–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Neumar RW. Optimal oxygenation during and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cur Opinion Crit Care. 2011;17:236–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283454c8c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Angelos MG. The role of oxygen in cardiac arrest resuscitation. Signa Vitae. 2010;5(Suppl 1):28–31. https://doi.org/10.22514/SV51.092010.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, et al. Part 5: adult basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality- 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2015;132(Suppl 2):S414–35. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Olasveengen TM, Semeraro F, Ristango G, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: basic life support. Resuscitation. 2021;161:98–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Idris AH, Guffey D, Pepe PE, et al. Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Critical Care Med. 2015;43:840–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kovacs A, Vadeboncoeur TF, Stolz U, et al. Chest compression release velocity: association with survival and favourable neurologic rotation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2015;92:107–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kurz MC, Prince D, Christenson J, et al. Association of advanced airway device with chest compression fraction during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;96:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.10.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Christenson J, Andrusiek D, Everson-Stewart S, et al. Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Circulation. 2009;120:1241–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.852202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rea T, Olsufka M, Yin L, et al. The relationship between chest compression fraction and outcome from ventricular fibrillation arrests in prolonged resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2014;85:879–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.02.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fernandez-Mendez M, Otero-Agra M, Fernandez-Mendez F, et al. Analysis of physiological response during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with personal protective equipment: a randomized crossover study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:7093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137093.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kienbacher CL, Grageneder J, Tscherny K, et al. The use of personal protection equipment does not impair the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective triple-cross over randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Resuscitation. 2021;160:79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rauch S, van Veelen MJ, Oberhammer R, et al. Effect of wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) on CPR quality in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: a stimulation, randomised crossover trial. J Clin Med. 2021;10:1728. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081728.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Tian Y, Tu X, Zhou X, et al. Wearing a N95 mask increases rescuer’s fatigue and decreases chest compression quality in simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;44:434–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yuan N, Yang WX, Lu JL, Lv ZH. Investigation of adverse reactions in healthcare personnel working in level 3 barrier protection PPE to treat COVID-19. Postgrad Med J. 2021;97:351–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sahu AK, Suresh S, Mathew R, et al. Impact of personal protective equipment on the effectiveness of chest compression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;39:190–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.09.058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bongers CCWG, de Korte JQ, Catoire M, et al. Infographic: cooling strategies to attenuate PPE-induced heat strain during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55:69–70. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Woo CC. First aid and emergency care education for chiropractic students: a course at Macquarie University. J Manipul Physiol Ther. 2000;23:645–51. https://doi.org/10.1067/mmt.2000.110940.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nam HS, Yeon MY, Park JW, et al. Healthcare workers infected with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Korea, 2015. Epidemiol Health. 2017;39:e2017052. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2017052.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Suen LKP, Guo YP, Tong DWK, et al. Self-contamination during doffing of personal protective equipment by healthcare workers to prevent Ebola transmission. Antimicrobial Resist Infect Control. 2018;7:157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-018-0433-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. World Health Organization. OpenWHO: About the COVID-19 course series. 2020. Available at: https://openwho.org/courses?q=COVID-19. Accessed 28 May 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CC Woo Chiropractic Clinic, Chatswood, NSW, 2057, Australia

    Chun-Cheung Woo

Authors
  1. Chun-Cheung Woo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CCW conceived and wrote the paper. The author read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-Cheung Woo.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woo, CC. COVID-19-specific adult basic life support guideline strategies for chiropractors and other healthcare providers to maximize the safety and efficacy of resuscitation: a commentary. Chiropr Man Therap 31, 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-023-00488-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-023-00488-y

Keywords

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies

ISSN: 2045-709X